We performed a comparison between Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."
More Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility Pros →
"It's easy to search within the solution."
"Its traversability is most valuable. I can use ArchiMate, and I can create a UML model. ArchiMate is for logical enterprise architecture, UML is for software engineering, and BPMN is for business processes. I can build it to have multiple models, and they are also traversable, which is not something that every tool allows. If there is a huge organization, you can segment it and have separate models for business technology or internal resource management system. You don't need to keep them in one model, and you can decide to segregate them."
"The advantages of Enterprise are that it's cheaper and much more practical than MagicDraw."
"Using Sparx Enterprise Architect allowed my customer to detail and make the company's IT strategy visible and accessible to all. The system provided clear roadmaps for IT development and helped to keep up-to-date documentation of systems and processes."
"Artifact templates are most valuable."
"We have found the stability to be very reliable."
"There are a couple of things. Price is one thing, but we also like the scriptability of it. We got into scripting it and automating tasks with it, and it is super duper easy to do and helpful. The API has improved over the years. We automate everything, and I love the automation aspects of it."
"The most valuable feature of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is the value streams."
"The user interface needs improvement. The solution needs to add a few features to improve the overall user experience. Security needs to be strengthened as well."
More Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility Cons →
"The window froze for five or ten seconds. You can click and click again and it takes a second to come up. It might have been specific to a version."
"In general, we now have a problem with Sparx Enterprise Architect because many analysts think it's too complicated to use in a giant environment."
"The integration could be improved."
"The automatic creation of reports based on the model elements could be improved."
"I have found the solution is lacking options. The general usability needs improvement and more compliance to CML definitions."
"The Portfolio Management features can be added in the next release. As it helps you to manage more portfolio of projects and architectures of cost projects on a portfolio level. This would be an important feature in the next release."
"Insufficient control of metadata and standards."
"When many users are accessing the system at the same time, Sparx slows down. It can't easily support a large team."
More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is ranked 31st in Enterprise Architecture Management while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 97 reviews. Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is rated 8.0, while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility writes "A stable scalable solution with mid-range price points". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect writes "Easy to set up and had no issues with stability, but it's not a very friendly tool, and its database modeling and entity-relationship modeling functions need improvement". Atoll Technologies System Architecture Management Utility is most compared with , whereas Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is most compared with Visual Paradigm, Visio, No Magic MagicDraw, Lucidchart and LeanIX.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.