We performed a comparison between Automic Workload Automation and AutoSys Workload Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Automic Workload Automation is highly praised for its robustness, scalability, and implementation simplicity. It provides control over various operating systems and products. AutoSys Workload Automation is valued for its scalability, user-friendly interface, and quick execution.
Automic Workload Automation needs industry-standardization and plug-and-play automation processes, improved language support, better functionality, a user-friendly interface, an enhanced web-based edition, and more competitive pricing. AutoSys Workload Automation users want integration with cloud services, easier reporting and comparison of job performance, better Linux environment integration, improved file transfer job handling, advanced features and functionalities, and the ability to monitor and manage workload windows.
Service and Support: Automic Workload Automation's customer service has received both positive and negative feedback. Some customers appreciate the prompt response and informative knowledge articles, while others have faced challenges in contacting the support team. AutoSys Workload Automation's customer service is highly acclaimed, with users describing it as excellent, helpful, and responsive. The support team is perceived as competent and equipped.
Ease of Deployment: Automic Workload Automation's setup duration varies from one to five days. AutoSys Workload Automation boasts a quick and uncomplicated setup process, requiring only 10 minutes or less. The simplicity of the setup may be influenced by the user's familiarity and needs.
Pricing: Automic Workload Automation offers pricing based on the number of systems being orchestrated, which is considered expensive yet still affordable compared to similar solutions. AutoSys Workload Automation involves a yearly subscription and an annual license, with costs for agents and server setup that can vary.
ROI: There is a lack of ROI information for Automic Workload Automation. AutoSys offers various advantages including heightened productivity, enhanced efficiency, cost savings, improved visibility and control, and decreased downtime. However, the actual ROI may differ depending on factors like company size and workload complexity.
Comparison Results: Automic Workload Automation is highly recommended due to its impressive strength, scalability, and effortless implementation. Users appreciate its extensive range of features and intuitive interface. Automic's versatility in managing various operating systems and products is particularly valuable for environments that contain a blend of outdated and modern technologies.
"All the components that it can use to design work flow; process automation."
"The most valuable features are its robustness, it's highly scalable, and it's easy to implement."
"The solution helped us fix issues and optimize them. We now run with zero errors."
"Support is good and it works fine."
"Workload Automation's most valuable features are perspective analytics and coding."
"We do not have to use a broad variety of agents to connect to different types of systems."
"The most valuable feature is the one for SAP batch processing... There are certain other mid-level workload automation tools which can handle the OS level, but SAP is something which is really very critical. Automic stands out from the ordinary tools because handling SAP processes is absolutely easy with it."
"It's pretty stable. After implementation, there hasn't been a single event where we shifted our jobs for the day from automated to manual."
"Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."
"The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs."
"Automic Automation Engine provides us the ability to map logic using a scripting language."
"It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good."
"The solution has been stable."
"The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users."
"We automate recurring processes, keeping track of IT processes controlled worldwide."
"This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."
"There are pain points, like anything else. Sometimes, things they say work, and sometimes, they don't work. You need to find out why they don't work and then go back and have them fixed."
"We would like a way to test our cloud-based automations on-premises, and then migrate them to the cloud after they have been tested, without needing an additional license."
"Every time we have an upgrade for a new version, we have stability problems, because the versions are not as good as they should be."
"There is one missing part in the product concerning recurring tasks. You can schedule a recurring task by a context action, and run it as recurrent, but it creates a time container which can be quit and disappears."
"The new UI feels unready. It makes your browsers crash."
"The manage file transfer area could be better. The file transfer area needs improvement. Other products like Control-M have some good features in this area."
"It would be better if it was easier to view the automated processes."
"From my point of view, the current product needs more stability."
"Documentation and cross-application externals could be improved."
"A better graphical user interface, because we have a lot of people using the client utility, and we want to get them away from that."
"CA installation processes are never anything but complex."
"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve in the Linux environment. The previous versions of the AutoSys Workload Automation let you take the profile of the user that you were using to run the tasks that you're going to automate, but in the latest versions, you can't do that, you need to make more definitions and it's a little bit difficult. It was easier in the previous versions."
"Performance improvements in the UI would be appreciated."
"To make it a lot more user-friendly, in order to make it so other people can use it without having to do much training with it; the more user-friendly it is, the easier it is to work with."
"It lacks support and integration with cloud computing platforms."
Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation, AppWorx Workload Automation and IBM Workload Automation, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Workload Automation report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.