We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and GoCD based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"The integrations are good."
"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."
"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."
"The UI is colorful."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."
"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."
"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."
"The tool must be more user-friendly."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews while GoCD is ranked 10th in Build Automation with 6 reviews. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while GoCD is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GoCD writes "User-friendly, useful multiple pipeline capabilities, and low resource consumption". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and AWS CodeBuild, whereas GoCD is most compared with GitLab, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tekton, GitHub Actions and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. See our AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
