We performed a comparison between AWS Savings Plans and Azure Cost Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Cost Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of AWS Savings Plans is we can discuss budgets briefly during our confirmation process since we are aware of our usual consumption patterns. Creating budgets in this regard would be beneficial, as it would allow us to consume only what we need, without including reserve instances that do not serve our purpose."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"Billing management is self-explanatory. There isn't a specific feature that stands out, but it's a fundamental aspect that needs to be present."
"Microsoft's technical support is good."
"The most valuable feature is that it helps us to better forecast and reduce costs."
"It encompasses a multitude of specialized services, each with its associated costs and considerations."
"The tool helps with budgeting and reporting. It notifies us whenever we cross the threshold."
"The best thing about Azure Cost Management is the cost analysis functionality because it provides regular alerts."
"It is easy to log in, and everything is graphical so that you can build on the published resources."
"The visibility of AWS Savings Plans could improve."
"In the future, it would be interesting if there could be a combination of Savings Plans and some Reserved Servers."
"Improved integration with other solutions could definitely be beneficial."
"The technical support could be improved."
"The initial setup is a little bit complex."
"Stability is an area in the solution that lacks in certain areas. So, it needs to be improved."
"It would be nice if they could introduce connections to other clouds. It would be good to connect to AWS and Oracle cloud."
"The affordability of licenses and subscription fees is a critical consideration, as not all companies can easily manage the cost of expensive licenses."
"I would like to see some features included for costing and more information about the components of deployment. Sometimes, it's very difficult to match the component with the solution because the descriptions are not very clear."
"We would like to see more flexibility added to this solution, such as being able to compare reservations, or compare costs across multiple financial years and report on the reasons for deviation in spend."
AWS Savings Plans is ranked 6th in Cloud Cost Management with 2 reviews while Azure Cost Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Cost Management with 41 reviews. AWS Savings Plans is rated 9.0, while Azure Cost Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Savings Plans writes "Scales well, is easy to set up, and is designed to help companies save money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "A good, but limited cost information solution with strong analytics but requiring more flexibility in its reporting functionality". AWS Savings Plans is most compared with Zesty, Cloudability and IBM Turbonomic, whereas Azure Cost Management is most compared with IBM Turbonomic, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, Cloudability, Zabbix and Datadog. See our AWS Savings Plans vs. Azure Cost Management report.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
