Axcient x360Recover vs Azure Site Recovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Axcient Logo
230 views|28 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
1,050 views|823 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axcient x360Recover and Azure Site Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Mike Douthitt
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's super stable. We really like it."

More Axcient x360Recover Pros →

"We use the tool for business continuity purposes.""It is a very stable product and very scalable.""What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution.""What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations.""We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry.""Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery.""Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR).""The solution is very easy to use."

More Azure Site Recovery Pros →

Cons
"As of today, I have to shut everything down and the entire resource has to be offline while I'm doing the recovery. So having the ability to kind of recover while running would be a great feature to have."

More Axcient x360Recover Cons →

"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.""I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call.""The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing.""The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional.""Site Recovery's scalability could be improved.""I would like to see more security features.""We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.""Could have more integration with other platforms."

More Azure Site Recovery Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I believe that (if I'm not mistaken), there are a couple of different pricing models."
  • More Axcient x360Recover Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."
  • "I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."
  • "The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."
  • "They have a license to pay."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is affordable."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
  • "The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
  • More Azure Site Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.
    Top Answer:The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required. From an improvement perspective, the solution should provide ease of use to its users and try to be a complete solution… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    230
    Comparisons
    28
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,050
    Comparisons
    823
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    The tools and applications available for managing and optimizing IT environments are largely built on legacy architectures and designs. This contributes to an increasingly complicated, messy and inefficient technology environment.

    At Axcient we solve complicated technology problems with powerfully simple solutions that help businesses run at their full potential, without interruption.

    We do this by combining the power and scale of the cloud with the flexibility of software-defined architectures and the simplicity of consumer applications.

    Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

    Sample Customers
    Ford Bacon & Davis, Torrance Casting, Northeast Valley Health Corporation, Bartlett Cocke General Contractors, Bruno Gerbino and Soriano, IronEdge Group, The Pennington School, NSK, Datasafe, InPursuit Solutions, Borough of West Chester
    Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Disaster Recovery as a Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Axcient x360Recover is ranked 10th in Disaster Recovery as a Service while Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews. Axcient x360Recover is rated 9.0, while Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Axcient x360Recover writes "State-of-the-art disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". Axcient x360Recover is most compared with , whereas Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Commvault Cloud.

    See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.