We performed a comparison between Azure Key Vault and ManageEngine Password Manager Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution speeds up the product development life cycle. That is, the time from the development of the product to the time to market is drastically reduced because of the CI/CD pipelines. You can have your code deployed within a matter of minutes."
"The solution can scale up as needed."
"Technical support is helpful."
"It stores sensitive information in an encrypted way. We don't have to worry about data loss or data theft because no one can see our information."
"Azure Key Vault's performance is excellent. It makes infrastructure management easier."
"The solution uses the encryption technique to store the secret information data that uses EPCE. There is also one feature that monitors Azure Key Vault."
"Azure Key Vault is very affordable, with charges of less than a dollar for over ten thousand keys."
"The best feature is the integrity of the .NET applications in our company."
"The security provided is very enhanced and it does a great job of keeping passwords safe."
"The tool is secure, safe, reliable, and easy to use."
"It is very safe and we haven't had any security issues."
"The support from the customer service team is good, they respond on time, and they always seem to be quite knowledgeable."
"It is user-friendly. Someone who doesn’t have a lot of IT knowledge can work with the product easily."
"Many times, the first round of support itself will fail, and they will bring some more competent people in the subsequent support. So it gets into a hierarchical mode. By then, we will lose a good amount of time. The technical support needs improvement."
"We encountered a few problems where Azure had infrastructure problems like the DMS."
"They should add a key vault feature for the databases temporarily integrated into hybrid clouds."
"The integration with Thales HSM is complex and is not out-of-the-box. Uploading the keys was quite a tedious process."
"The solution needs to improve its cost."
"The big problem with Azure Key Vault is key rotation. We haven't found a good way to synchronize the credentials between the databases and Key Vault."
"Currently, our company has to add the secrets manually, one by one, in Azure Key Vault, which is a tedious process."
"It needs to offer dynamic secrets management."
"There is room for improvement in making the UI more user-friendly."
"It's a pretty technical solution. It's designed for more technical people."
"The user interface could be improved and made more user friendly."
More ManageEngine Password Manager Pro Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Key Vault is ranked 1st in Enterprise Password Managers with 46 reviews while ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is ranked 13th in Enterprise Password Managers with 5 reviews. Azure Key Vault is rated 8.6, while ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Azure Key Vault writes "Allows us to securely store our keys to prevent unauthorized access to unwanted users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Password Manager Pro writes "Secure, safe, reliable, and easy to use". Azure Key Vault is most compared with AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, AWS Certificate Manager and BeyondTrust Password Safe, whereas ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is most compared with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, HashiCorp Vault, BeyondTrust Password Safe, Delinea Secret Server and WALLIX Bastion. See our Azure Key Vault vs. ManageEngine Password Manager Pro report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.