We performed a comparison between Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to maintain the solution."
"The most valuable feature is the autoscaling and self-healing."
"Its support team resolves technical issues accurately."
"The serverless capability and auto scale feature are the most valuable."
"The most valuable features of AKS are the full array of capabilities and robust security."
"The product’s most valuable features are ease of use and automation."
"It employs high availability."
"It is a stable solution."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"The mean time to detect has been reduced."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."
"PingSafe released a new security graph tool that helps us identify the root issue. Other tools give you a pass/fail type of profile on all misconfigurations, and those will run into the thousands. PingSafe's graphing algorithm connects various components together and tries to identify what is severe and what is not. It can correlate various vulnerabilities and datasets to test them on the back end to pinpoint the real issue."
"We liked the search bar in PingSafe. It is a global search. We were able to get some insights from there."
"My favorite feature is Storyline."
"The agentless vulnerability scanning is great."
"Our previous product took a lot of man hours to manage. Once we got Singularity Cloud Workload Security, it freed up our time to work on other tasks."
"Its integration functions could be enhanced."
"More control over Infra scanning can be introduced."
"There is room for improvement in automation processes, as well."
"It would be nice if they could handle the management of personal information more efficiently."
"The initial setup is complex."
"I would like to see Azure implement something like the K9 terminal for interacting with Kubernetes clusters. It's a user-friendly CLI interface."
"It just loses out because you have less access to it programmatically, with less technical or customizable access."
"The initial setup of AKS is complicated. The setup depends on the cluster, nodes, and lots of other things. There are also lots of extremely critical small devices. Moreover, you will have to pay them even while setting up the solution. It is not like you setup first and then pay for it."
"I used to work on AWS. At times, I would generate a normal bug in my system, and then I would check PingSafe. The alert used to come after about three and a half hours. It used to take that long to generate the alert about the vulnerability in my system. If a hacker attacks a system and PingSafe takes three to four hours to generate an alert, it will not be beneficial for the company. It would be helpful if we get the alert in five to ten minutes."
"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"They could generally give us better comprehensive rules."
"The alerting system of the product is an area that I look at and sometimes get confused about. I feel the alerting feature needs improvement."
"Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky."
"We use PingSafe and also SentinelOne. If PingSafe integrated some of the endpoint security features of SentinelOne, it would be the perfect one-stop solution for everything. We wouldn't need to switch between the products. At my organization, I am responsible for endpoint security and vulnerability management. Integrating both functions into one application would be ideal because I could see all the alerts, heat maps, and reports in one console."
"We had a glitch in PingSafe where it fed us false positives in the past."
More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is ranked 13th in Container Security with 32 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Container Security with 67 reviews. Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is rated 8.2, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) writes "Decreases administrative burdens and costs, has good diagnostic tools, and is easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, SUSE Rancher and Qualys VMDR, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security and AWS GuardDuty. See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
