We performed a comparison between Bitbar and SmartBear TestComplete based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good."
"TestComplete is simple, it's a very easy-to-use tool."
"The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find."
"The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing."
"The ease-of-use and quality of the overall product are above average."
"In TestComplete, I saw a conformed package of a tool that kept everybody in consistency. The team was able to regenerate further tests without having to manipulate more code because the record feature is great."
"It works very fine. It is fast on almost any machine, and it is also very well organized. I like its object mapping and its capability to find and interact with almost everything that exists on Windows."
"Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses."
"There could be API interfaces with this tool."
"Headless testing would be a big improvement."
"In the cross-browser domain, it has a few snags with Microsoft Edge and Chrome; although, these problems are not critical."
"Right now, the product only supports Windows."
"The initial setup of SmartBear TestComplete was complex."
"The pricing is the constraint."
"TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services."
Earn 20 points
Bitbar is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 72 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "A stable product that needs to improve its integration capabilities with other test management tools". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting, LambdaTest and Perfecto, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Ranorex Studio, OpenText UFT One and Selenium HQ. See our Bitbar vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
