We compared Bonita and Camunda based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
User reviews indicate that Bonita is highly praised for its user-friendly interface, customization options, seamless integration, and process automation. On the other hand, Camunda stands out for its exceptional workflow management, task allocation, and tracking abilities. While Bonita focuses on user satisfaction and cost-effective pricing, Camunda excels in customer service and flexible licensing options. Areas for improvement in Bonita include the user interface and integration capabilities, while Camunda could benefit from more intuitive interfaces and better documentation.
Features: The valuable features of Bonita include a user-friendly interface, powerful workflow management capabilities, comprehensive customization options, seamless integration with existing systems, and efficient process automation. On the other hand, Camunda is praised for its exceptional workflow management capabilities, task allocation and tracking efficiency, seamless integration with other systems, user-friendly graphical interface, flexible customization options, and reliable performance.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Bonita is reported to be straightforward and hassle-free, ensuring an easy implementation process. Users appreciate that the licensing aspect of Bonita offers flexibility with different options. For Camunda, users find the setup cost not overly complicated or time-consuming, with licensing praised for being flexible and accommodating., Users have reported positive ROI from both Bonita and Camunda. Bonita focuses on optimizing processes and improving efficiency, while Camunda excels in streamlining business processes and improving workflow management, leading to increased productivity and cost-effectiveness.
Room for Improvement: Bonita has room for improvement in terms of user interface, functionality, ease of use, and integration capabilities. On the other hand, Camunda could enhance its user interface, documentation, and integration capabilities to provide a more intuitive and user-friendly experience.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Bonita focus on highlighting the importance of considering both deployment and setup timeframes, and the experiences of users in implementing the tech solution. On the other hand, the reviews for Camunda mention varying durations for deployment and setup, emphasizing the need to evaluate the context in which the terms are used., Bonita's customer service stands out due to the helpful and responsive assistance provided by their team. Users appreciate the advice and guidance received, which exceeded their expectations. On the other hand, Camunda's customer service receives positive acclaim for its prompt response times and helpful assistance. Users express satisfaction with the reliability, effectiveness, expertise, and professionalism exhibited throughout their interactions.
The summary above is based on 28 interviews we conducted recently with Bonita and Camunda users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."
"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."
"Development of forms and flows."
"The user interface is easy to use."
"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."
"Process automation with Bonita BPM is really easy."
"Bonita is user-friendly."
"I really enjoy using the workflow management."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"It has an open BPM"
"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."
"It is missing some important features that other products have."
"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."
"There is a considerable learning curve."
"Installation could be made easier."
"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."
"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."
"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
Bonita is ranked 11th in Business Process Design with 27 reviews while Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 71 reviews. Bonita is rated 8.2, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". Bonita is most compared with Bizagi, Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, ProcessMaker and Appian, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and AWS Step Functions. See our Bonita vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can build workflows very quickly and the integrations are very good. They offer a community version, which can be used for free.
However, the community edition of Bonita has very limited module functionality. If there was more functionality available from the enterprise edition, this would make Bonita an easier solution to learn. We have experienced some problems due to lack of documentation; more would be better, as would sample source code.
Camunda allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very quickly. This solution is very stable with a free open-source version that is very good. The automation of this solution is great.
Camunda can be challenging in terms of initial setup. It seems to take a long time for completed workflows to be implemented on the Camunda Platform. The learning curve for this solution can be pretty steep. A mobile app would be a welcome enhancement to this solution. Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved and better template options would be welcomed.
Conclusion
After researching both these solutions closely, we chose the Camunda Platform. We feel Camunda is very stable, excellent at tracking bugs, and has a powerful BPMN engine. Camunda Platform is very developer-friendly and has helped us optimize our business process and achieve our productivity and profitability goals. We found Camunda Platform to be very portable. The cross-language capabilities support multiple frameworks and the number of client implementations make Camunda Platform very pluggable and a very good choice for us.