We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature."
"Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task."
"One special aspect of Azure Logic Apps is its easy integration of various applications, especially when connectors are already available. For instance, there are connectors for database applications and systems like SAP. You can drag and drop the connectors to complete your integration quickly."
"The product has efficient connectors."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"It's very easy to use, and it's blazing fast. The best thing about Logic Apps is actually its ability to create a solution in a matter of hours. It doesn't need any kind of provisioning, and you don't need any kind of hardware. You can create very small elements like these Logic Apps, and you can build a whole solution from those very simple and small elements. I also like that they are completely incorporated with your existing active directory. You can use user groups directly from the active directory inside Azure and access it from the Logic Apps. You don't need to do anything special, and you just have access. You can just check if the user is, for example, allowed to do some action. Normally it would take you some additional steps and some additional calls to check it. You have to come back to the active directory to make this possible. In Logic Apps, you just have it, and you can use it. I think that there's this concept of logging and recall to the Logic App. It shows you every single step, every single product, and the result it's returning to the next step. It also has an amazing debugging feature. You can rerun some calls and see if, after a correction of the Logic App, for example, you get the correct results. So, it's almost like it's alive. It's like you make a change, poof it, and it's in production, and it's working. The speed of the composition of the problem and creating a real solution for it is extremely fast with this solution. It's extremely fast in creation."
"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."
"The standard logic app could be simplified. Thats what we would like to see in the next release."
"The stability of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is stable. However, we have had some issues in the past. They do resolve issues that arise from new releases."
"It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications."
"Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector."
"An area for improvement for Azure Logic Apps could be enhancing its ability to handle large datasets. When dealing with extensive data, we often have to use Azure Data Factory, which is mostly limited to scheduled jobs."
"Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
