We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and LambdaTest based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: BrowserStack slightly nudges ahead of LambdaTest in this comparison. BrowserStack offers seamless access - users can use many different devices to gain access. Integration is good and the solution updates regularly to add new device options. LambdaTest is lacking in some basic features that other solutions provide and its performance can be a bit slow.
"The most valuable feature is that it provides parallel and cross-browser testing. It enables us to run tests on multiple browsers or devices simultaneously."
"The integration is very good."
"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."
"The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."
"The most valuable features are the variety of tools available."
"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."
"I like that it offers full device capability."
"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."
"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."
"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."
"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."
"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."
"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."
"There is some stability issue in the product, making it in areas where improvements are required."
"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms."
"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."
"Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier."
"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."
"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."
"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."
"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."
"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."
"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."
"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 19 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while LambdaTest is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". BrowserStack is most compared with Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, CrossBrowserTesting and Bitbar, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Perfecto and Bitbar. See our BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.