We performed a comparison between Camunda and ELMA 365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Camunda is a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"The product has a good task management engine."
"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
"It has an open BPM"
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"It's costly and not accessible for small enterprises or startups. It would be great if Camunda offered a tier plan for smaller companies."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"Customers want improved productivity."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while ELMA 365 is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review. Camunda is rated 8.2, while ELMA 365 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ELMA 365 writes "A great ERP for medium and even small businesses". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas ELMA 365 is most compared with Bitrix24, WorkFusion, Bizagi and IBM BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
