We performed a comparison between Camunda and Flowable based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, BMC and others in Process Automation."The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"The flexibility is great."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"The tool's most valuable feature is the process engine. It allows us to define BPM-based workflows, deploy them into our process engine, and interact with them within our product."
"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"In my opinion, areas of improvement for Flowable include the management and creation of forms within the open-source components and the documentation and examples provided. While the cloud-based Flowable implementation with no-code features is attractive, we prefer more control over integration, especially since we deploy our product onto AWS. We also want to avoid additional licensing fees for Flowable runtime user components on top of our software development and implementation charges."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 71 reviews while Flowable is ranked 25th in Process Automation with 1 review. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Flowable is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Flowable writes "Helps to control the workflow and business process components of customers' operations but OSGi integration can be challenging ". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Flowable is most compared with Bonita.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
