We performed a comparison between Camunda and Red Hat Polymita Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The product is stable."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"It has an open BPM"
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
"An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."
"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."
More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 48th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.