We performed a comparison between Camunda and Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"The solution is useful for small projects."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"It has an open BPM"
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"Development is easy on the Ultimus platform."
"Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management has good integration with all the other tools we have been using in our company. We use the data that other tools provide in our implementation."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"It's costly and not accessible for small enterprises or startups. It would be great if Camunda offered a tier plan for smaller companies."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."
"Ultimus is not good at handling cash transactions. They should add a mobile application in the next release."
"We are looking for a feature that can resign and move the process from one step to another step."
More Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is ranked 52nd in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management writes "Integrates well and helpful support". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is most compared with Appian. See our Camunda vs. Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.