We compared Cato Networks and Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: After evaluating user reviews, it is evident that both Cato Networks and Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform have received positive reviews. Cato Networks is appreciated for its simple installation process and valuable features, while Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is highly regarded for its strong security measures, user-friendly interface, and extensive control options. Cato Networks stands out for its quick and efficient setup, whereas Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform shines in terms of comprehensive security measures and ease of use. However, some users mention that managing remote sites can be time-consuming with Cato Networks, and there may be intermittent performance issues and a learning curve for beginners in zero trust models with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform. It is worth mentioning that both products offer excellent customer service and support.
"The most valuable features of Cato Networks are the always-on VPN for remote workers and centralized management. Additionally, web filtering and antivirus are good."
"It's a pretty straightforward solution."
"The scalability is quite good."
"The feature that I find to be the most valuable is the bandwidth aggregation."
"Cato offers all the functionality found in other solution. The life cycle management is always very stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it also works as a next-gen firewall because it has security features."
"What I found most helpful in Cato Networks is that it works out of the box. One of its main advantages is that it's a simple product to deploy. You subscribe, and you're ready to run."
"The query and the SD-WAN are useful features of the solution."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform removes the risk of exposing the applications to the public."
"Its functionality is a bit limited in some areas as compared to a Cisco solution. It is not as granular. It doesn't have the manageability, feature set, and capabilities of a larger or an enterprise-level solution. It just needs a more robust feature set and granularity."
"We would like the product to continue to improve its security."
"The different languages in the user interface should be enhanced."
"Web application firewalling (WAF) is a feature we would like to have in this solution and does not exist yet."
"They should add more sophisticated security features. It should also be integrated into the cloud."
"The solution is not cheap."
"The tool needs to be more granular. Its reports are not very in-depth."
"Modifying or incorporating Cato Network to work with a third-party platform, such as Microsoft, or other Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offerings would be beneficial. Having more integration partners would help the users implement the solution."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation."
More Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cato SASE Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in ZTNA as a Service with 21 reviews while Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is ranked 15th in ZTNA as a Service with 1 review. Cato SASE Cloud Platform is rated 8.8, while Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cato SASE Cloud Platform writes "Useful remote worker VPN, centralized management, and simple on-boarding process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform writes "Helps to secure applications from public but needs improvement in documentation ". Cato SASE Cloud Platform is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cisco SD-WAN, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet FortiGate and VMware SD-WAN, whereas Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is most compared with Twingate and Axis Security.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.