We performed a comparison between CentOS and Google Chrome Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like how you can alternate certain things and minimize admin features on there and just let it run on specific scripts. It's nice. Even if I had to put it in a container, I'd still do it. I prefer Linux over Windows any day."
"The most valuable feature of CentOS is that it is easy to use."
"It’s scalable."
"The solution is easy to use but not as easy as Windows."
"The open architecture is useful for us. That's why we're using CentOS."
"It helps us install and deploy our applications."
"The solution is extremely stable."
"It is a stable soultion."
"The breadth and capability of the various extensions and plug-ins that are out there for Chrome to do additional things on top of just working in the browser are fantastic."
"The solution has been stable."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance."
"The best part of Chrome is security."
"Google Chrome Enterprise is a stable solution with good performance."
"Chrome Enterprise is really easy to deploy and manage."
"It could be more secure."
"CentOS is not easy."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"If a proper GUI-based tool was connected remotely or on the machine, it could be a great addition to CentOS."
"The server system is a little bit tough to manage."
"The security could be improved because the server system isn't very secure."
"The interface could be improved."
"There could be more integration features included in the product."
"Identifying areas for improvement can be challenging since Chrome consistently strives to enhance itself. One aspect I'd like to highlight is virtualization. For instance, if you require desktop-based applications like Cisco or Adobe products on your local machine, Chrome's support is limited. While they offer Linux solutions for virtualization, my query or request would be to expand this to include Windows-based applications. If this were implemented, it would be a valuable enhancement, encouraging broader adoption by companies."
"The product's stability can be better."
"The solution could be made cheaper."
"They need to deal with their memory management."
"I wish there was a way that they could update things a little less often if anything. I think a lot of enterprise customers are frustrated... Certain plug-ins like ad blockers will lose some functionality in the next quarter to half a year."
"Additional data security and data privacy features could be proactively recommended by Google."
"Chromebooks are hard to find in the Indonesian market."
"The solution's interface is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
CentOS is ranked 5th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 63 reviews while Google Chrome Enterprise is ranked 9th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 15 reviews. CentOS is rated 8.2, while Google Chrome Enterprise is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CentOS writes "Allows you to securely store data, and command prompts make it simple to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Chrome Enterprise writes "A scalable solution that allows its users to create, share and edit documents internally within an organization". CentOS is most compared with Oracle Linux, Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Windows Server and SUSE Linux Enterprise, whereas Google Chrome Enterprise is most compared with Island, Avira Secure Browser, Talon, Windows 10 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). See our CentOS vs. Google Chrome Enterprise report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
