We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is notable for its extensive data protection, incident identification, and adaptable rule sets. It provides control over IAM roles, training options, and robust reporting. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration excels at API-driven integration and advanced prevention of data leaks. Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management could enhance its reporting, vulnerability assessments, integration, and customizability. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration requires improvements in integration, performance, and collaboration capabilities.
Service and Support: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has been praised for its helpful support. Some Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration customers were dissatisfied with response times and requested support in more languages, but others said the support was excellent.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is quick and painless, and the overall deployment varies. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration has an automated setup that requires minimal user intervention.
Pricing: Some users found Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management to be reasonably priced and compatible, while others perceive it as costly. Reviewers had mostly good things to say about the cost of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. Users describe the licensing as uncomplicated and budget-friendly.
ROI: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management offers benefits in terms of compliance management and decreased administrative workload. One user reported a 35% return on investment (ROI) and a notable growth rate. Reviewers also said that Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration consistently delivers a solid return. Users reported estimated ROIs ranging from 15% to 80%.
Comparison Results: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is preferred over Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. Users appreciate CloudGuard's comprehensive data security and protection for the entire cloud infrastructure. It offers strong incident detection, granular reporting, and the ability to customize rulesets based on compliance requirements. CloudGuard provides IAM role control and embedded machine learning for real-time attack prevention. Users find the dashboard intuitive, reporting powerful, and the product's ability to enhance security and resolve incidents impressive.
"The audit feature is the most valuable for compliance reasons. It gives you a full view of the whole environment, no matter how many accounts you have in AWS or Azure. You have it all under one umbrella."
"It is able to bring visibility into that cloudy space where the security departments do not really see what is happening on the DevOps side. It brings visibility, security control, and standardization."
"Alerts of cloud activity happening across all accounts is helpful."
"The two most valuable features for us are the central firewall administrator and the real-time cloud compliance monitoring."
"The user interface is responsive and quite intuitive; when selecting an object it automatically shows the relevant actions."
"We know the vulnerability in advance, so we can take some action for that vulnerability."
"Assets Management as it provide complete visibility of our workload inkling EC2 instance or Serverless"
"The reporting against compliance is an important feature that helps you comply with policies and standards within your organization."
"The stuff that it's picking up and blocking and stopping from coming into our environment has been fantastic."
"We need the phishing detection and email quarantine. Once an email is considered malicious, it stays in the quarantine where we can interrogate it. We can check out why it was quarantined and see if it should be delivered to the individual."
"For Threat Prevention, I was impressed with this feature and the solution's effectiveness. It has been very good."
"Based on domain and URL reputation, it will allow traffic to flow."
"The feature I find to be most valuable is very much the zero-touch provisioning. I was able to be up, operational, and 100 percent functional in less than a half an hour."
"The product offers good and easy integration capabilities with other products."
"It seems quite scalable. We don't anticipate any scaling issues. We have it deployed in the cloud."
"Machine Learning and AI for email security have helped all the organization's members to guard their information against insecure exposure."
"The performance can be better. Sometimes, the performance is not up to the mark. There is also integration complexity with third-party software and tools."
"In general, for the product to be successful, they need to improve security, and configuration detection."
"Integration could be improved."
"I’d like to see more integration with third-party tools. For example, it would be helpful to have an integration between Dome9 and ServiceNow to manage security incidents and security changes."
"The product must provide different features like antivirus."
"Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required."
"There are opportunities for improvement that can be addressed through a roadmap."
"The tool should incorporate more use cases like improving security scores. It should also improve documentation."
"From time to time, the system's administrators notice the increase in the false-positive alerts being reported by CloudGuard SaaS."
"We have used technical support, but their response time is very slow. It needs to be improved."
"Stability has been a pain point. I was going back and forth with my product engineer and project manager for a couple of months. I had the product in a demonstration mode and wasn't satisfied with the results initially. After a few alterations and a few revisions later, it is fine."
"There is always room for improvement and growth."
"We understand that false positives are always there, but sometimes the notifications are more than expected."
"A phishing simulator would be helpful as a user training module."
"Cloud Guard would be a complete solution if Check Point added a comprehensive data loss solution that included capabilities such as bulk data transfer detection."
"The implementation could definitely be better."
More Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 63 reviews while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is ranked 9th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 48 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration writes "Has a user-friendly dashboard, a great anti-phishing algorithm, and sandboxing for testing". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Mimecast Email Security and Cisco Secure Email. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
