We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Claroty Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access."Once we install and connect the VPN service, it keeps on running until we disconnect."
"The clients of the customers have a facility to access the enterprise network."
"It operates effectively, particularly during challenges like adversities or infrastructure issues."
"The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware. This was a big advantage."
"The solution has been solid for me for over five years."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN enables us to access on-premise applications while working from remote locations."
"The tool is easy to configure and use. We integrated it with Active Directory to manage user authentication. It's intuitive and transparent, making it simple for users to use. It connects automatically to the VPN whenever users turn on the laptop. The product is efficient and offers centralized control."
"We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect."
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"In my organization, there aren't Linux users, however, I know it has difficulties offering secure access for customers who use this operating system."
"The VPN remote Access blade could be improved."
"In an environment with multiple cluster checkpoints, the global properties common to all clusters in some cases give problems."
"The interface itself needs improvement. When you need to create something, you have to go through a lot of steps. It needs to be simplified."
"There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features."
"The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed."
"Without a doubt and with the new trends in technology, Check Point should already have a blade with a 2MFA solution and not through some other vendor."
"The provisioning of VPN users has room for improvement."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 5th in Remote Access with 62 reviews while Claroty Platform is ranked 23rd in Remote Access with 1 review. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Claroty Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Darktrace and Armis.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.