We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very useful because it fits our requirements. It is also easy to use. It is not complex, and we are satisfied with the results."
"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."
"It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."
"The setup is fairly easy. We didn't struggle with the process at all."
"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model."
"Meta data is always needed."
"The plugins for the development environment have room for improvements such as for Android Studio and X code."
"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."
"We can run only one project at a time."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in API Security with 67 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 8th in API Security. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare. See our Checkmarx One vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.
See our list of best API Security vendors.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
