We performed a comparison between Cisco ASx500 and Citrix Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Universal Access Gateways solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It works well for any environment that wants to use a VPN."
"One of the most valuable features is keeping our data secure."
"The initial setup is simple."
"We haven't received any complaints or performance issues so far."
"I didn't have any hiccups or issues with it."
"It is easy to set up and is stable. It is scalable as well, depending on the model."
"It's a stable solution while it's running. We don't have to work on it a lot. There are not many bugs, so it's easy to use if you deploy successfully. You can be sure of an uninterrupted solution for quite a long time. Citrix is a good product."
"We have users in a remote environment that might require to access the service."
"Providing our organization the ability to work remotely was the most valuable feature of Citrix Gateway. I also enjoy that they are always adding features."
"Most of our customers are using the load balancing feature and also the verification feature is good as well, in my experience."
"The technical support from Cisco is not very good."
"There is no security, such as an antivirus and URL filtering mechanism, which is something that should be improved."
"There could be a faster connection, increased user-friendliness, and more comprehensive dashboards for the platform."
"We have experienced issues relating to multi-factor authentication"
"I would like to see improved logging because it doesn't keep much information for the session monitoring or historical sessions."
"Technical support could be improved."
"Their VAS product should be more productive because right now, we are using other VAS solutions but not using this one."
"The tool must provide better integration and connectivity."
"Citrix Gateway could improve the speed of the VPN. I sometimes have to wait for 10 to 15 minutes to get connected and other times when I am connected I have to abort, and reconnect."
"We are currently looking at automation. It would be good if there is some way to automate it in a fast way. It should be easy to automate. It also has some security issues."
Earn 20 points
Cisco ASx500 is ranked 3rd in Universal Access Gateways while Citrix Gateway is ranked 1st in Universal Access Gateways with 34 reviews. Cisco ASx500 is rated 8.0, while Citrix Gateway is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco ASx500 writes "Secure, scalable, and straightforward installation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Citrix Gateway writes "Provided the ability for remote work during the pandemic". Cisco ASx500 is most compared with , whereas Citrix Gateway is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Ivanti Connect Secure and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. See our Cisco ASx500 vs. Citrix Gateway report.
See our list of best Universal Access Gateways vendors.
We monitor all Universal Access Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
