We performed a comparison between Collibra Governance and Zaloni Data Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to collaborate and approve business terms for the business glossary data dictionary is excellent."
"Collibra's lineage is a very powerful feature. We have integrated Collibra with Azure and ADLS storage and we create lineage diagrams using the two tools."
"The solution's most valuable features are its scalability and how it can be integrated to any other intakes."
"We use the solution's Data Stewardship part."
"We have folks in the field doing our clinical research operations, and they have the opportunity to refer to Collibra when they are examining a particular report. When they have a question about how something in that report is derived, they can pull a metric that is defined fully in Collibra. They have the opportunity to drill back into Collibra to see that."
"In terms of data governance, as I mentioned, it can be a one-stop solution for all of your data governance needs."
"The most valuable feature is the Technical Lineage. The fact that you can trace the auditability of a particular field or attribute across various systems is very useful."
"The beauty of the solution is that you can customize it quite a bit."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to map data and write workflows with logic inside them."
"You can create a lot of ingestions based on the file levels or based on the time."
"It would be better if there was a way to import all data and metadata in an automatic way in one block form."
"The UI is good if you happen to be an administrator and are familiar with the technical side of the administration. If you're a business user, the UI is not good. It is hard to learn. It is hard for those who are administering it to teach to end-users and it can take hours of training to do it. Because it is difficult and non-intuitive, business users resist using it. It is a battle to get them on board and to keep them engaged because of the UI."
"From a usability perspective, customers usually find some areas of the solution a bit complex. It takes a long time for the customers to get used to the UI and the interface."
"The technical support could be better."
"There are certain limitations and difficulties regarding the migration of complex data quality rules, as the tool may struggle with lengthy calculations and longer loading times."
"The workflows and the language they use needs to be improved."
"I'm fairly new to the product, however, what I generally hear from my clients is that the requirement around having ways to ingest more metadata."
"This solution could be improved with the the addition of process diagrams to help the many users of the platform understand all the fields."
"The major pain point with Zaloni is that their exception handling is not good. If any event happens, it doesn't tell you at which point it failed and it doesn't tell the operations team how they should take corrective actions unless you call Zaloni and then identify the issues. That is one issue."
"Technical support is in need of improvement."
Earn 20 points
Collibra Governance is ranked 2nd in Data Governance with 41 reviews while Zaloni Data Platform is ranked 35th in Data Governance. Collibra Governance is rated 7.6, while Zaloni Data Platform is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Collibra Governance writes "Transformed our cross-functional business teams into one enterprise-facing view". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zaloni Data Platform writes "Solid multi-ingestion tool but with poor exception handling". Collibra Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Informatica Axon, Alation Data Catalog and BigID, whereas Zaloni Data Platform is most compared with . See our Collibra Governance vs. Zaloni Data Platform report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.