We performed a comparison between Comodo cWatch and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"We get alerts if we have some malware."
"This product is a reliable defense from malicious attacks on a network environment."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"Technical support was very helpful."
"Simplifies putting everything in code."
"Real-time monitoring is also a great tool, as you may watch several parameters in real time."
"There are quite a few useful Imperva Incapsula features. For example, one of them is the reports. The graphics are very good and it's easy to configure. The whole process is very fast and reliable too. They have good tech support as well."
"There is no need to have an appliance in house for the services because it is on the cloud."
"It's very pretty easy to onboard the URL."
"The portal is a little slow."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
"I would like to have support for SSL management and secure DNS."
"The salespeople tend to exaggerate its capabilities, which can cost you money if you don't verify the information."
"There’s nothing that’s missing in terms of features."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"It would be better if we were able to manage and apply changes to multiple websites/web applications, and search WAF logs for multiple websites, via the Incapsula dashboard."
"It needs to be improved every time there are new attacks."
"Imperva always needs to adjust to new versions of cyber attacks, it needs to be faster, improve the resiliency of the software of the solution."
"I miss being able to integrate the dashboard with other BI tools we are using. We have to export and import data to be able to present it, and doing so is a lot of work."
Earn 20 points
Comodo cWatch is ranked 19th in CDN with 4 reviews while Imperva DDoS is ranked 5th in CDN with 74 reviews. Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Alerts organizations if any malware is detected and removes it quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Sucuri, AWS WAF and SiteLock, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF. See our Comodo cWatch vs. Imperva DDoS report.
See our list of best CDN vendors and best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.