We performed a comparison between Corelight and Darktrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks."
"The most valuable feature is the embedded IDS from Suricata."
"It's an easy way for us to get visibility in a client's environment."
"Corelight is easy to use."
"It is easy to deploy and easy to handle."
"The most valuable feature of Darktrace is the AI that detects abnormal network activity."
"The NDR is good in their solution and they have NTG for email."
"It has helped the organization to detect any malware affecting the machines...The network monitoring and the email monitoring features are very valuable for us."
"We are able to detect a lot of things, actually, and see what is happening in our network."
"The most valuable feature of Darktrace and the most valuable feature is the artificial intelligence module because that is the tool that determines automatically if there is any risk or not in the network."
"The most valuable feature is the solution's ability to trim out the false positives and point your attention to the real important stuff."
"The most valuable feature has been the behavioral analytics that allows us to monitor all the traffic."
"It is very stable and easy to use."
"Machine learning could be a good improvement, but it's very costly."
"Corelight hasn’t added features in a long time."
"They can enhance the interface of the product. They can make it more interactive and also easier to use for feature access."
"In the next release, building a graphical user interface would be helpful."
"The solution’s architecture is complex and difficult to understand. There are multiple machines and VMs."
"A reporting portal could be a great addition to help customize reports."
"The dashboard and reporting for this solution could be improved as it is currently complex. The GUI for this solution could also be improved."
"It's a very complex platform."
"The pricing is a bit high for the region."
"Darktrace could improve its features, such as monitoring and detecting ransomware."
"Darktrace is a closed technology, meaning we know very little about how it works, including the architecture, which is significant. As a result, when we implement the system and find we're getting many false positives, we have minimal insight into why it's happening and what we can do to fix it. We don't know how the solution is configured, the criteria for threats to be determined, or the product's inner workings. We understand that they have to ensure privacy and their copyright, but we want to see some documentation or public research into the security Darktrace provides."
"The solution can improve the reporting."
"The program is quite expensive."
Corelight is ranked 7th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 5 reviews while Darktrace is ranked 1st in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 65 reviews. Corelight is rated 9.0, while Darktrace is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Corelight writes "An open-source solution that gave us insight into our clients' network traffic flow ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Darktrace writes "Great autonomous support, offers an easy setup, and has responsive support". Corelight is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Vectra AI, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Arista NDR and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, whereas Darktrace is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Vectra AI, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response. See our Corelight vs. Darktrace report.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.