We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Falcon and Uptycs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP).
"The most valuable feature is the network security."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that Microsoft Defender XDR is easy to integrate with other Microsoft platforms or products."
"The best feature is threat hunting. There are a lot of other features I like, such as the alert mechanism. The chain alert mechanism has a huge impact. It combines all the alerts into one incident and automatically correlates them with AI."
"The solution is well integrated with applications. It is easy to maintain and administer."
"The most valuable aspect is undoubtedly the exploration capability"
"The integration, visibility, vulnerability management, and device identification are valuable."
"The product integrates security into one tool instead of having third-party security tools."
"Microsoft Defender XDR provides strong identity protection with comprehensive insights into risky user behavior and potential indicators of compromise."
"Easy to use, intelligent, and stable threat detection software."
"I have found the connection to search the hosts for detections very useful in CrowdStrike Falcon."
"Probably the most valuable thing to me is the real-time response piece. The fact that I can connect to an endpoint as long as it is on the Internet, no matter where it is globally. I can remove files from the endpoint, drop files on the endpoint, stop processes, reboot it, run custom scripts, and deploy software. Pretty much no other tool can do all that."
"The most valuable features of Crowdstrike Falcon XDR are Spotlight and Discovery, they are helpful. Additionally, the console is user-friendly, with fewer false positives than other solutions."
"Scalability hasn't been an issue for us."
"Scalability is good. We have had no issues with it."
"The most valuable feature is its threat analysis."
"There's almost no maintenance required. It's very low if there's any at all."
"They have multiple great features."
"I personally have not seen much evidence of how Defender can enhance the story of zero trust for enterprises."
"The onboarding and offboarding need improvement. I work with other vendors as well, and they have an option to add a device or remove a device from the portal, whereas with Microsoft 365 Defender, we need to do that manually. However, once you do that, everything can be controlled through the portal, but getting the device onboarded and offboarded is currently manual. If we have an option to simply remove a device from the portal or get a device added from the portal, it would be more convenient. The rest of the features are similar. This is the only area where I found it different from others. I would also like to be able to simply filter with a few of the queries that are already there."
"The solution could improve by having better machine learning and AI. Additionally, the interface, documentation, and integration could be better."
"The solution does not offer a unified response and standard data."
"The advanced threat-hunting capabilities are phenomenal, and the security copilot enhances that, but some data elements could be better or have more context inside of the advanced tables themselves. The schemas feel a little limited to what they're building into the product. It's probably just a maturity thing. I imagine we'll see the features I want in the next year."
"Because of the training model, Defender XDR's automatic response sometimes blocks legitimate users and activities. Also, the UI sometimes responds slowly."
"Advanced attacks could use an improvement."
"At times, when we have an incident email and we click on the link for that incident, it opens a pop-up, but there is nothing. It has happened a couple of times."
"I would like CrowdStrike to provide some correlation in the threat analysis, so we can visualize things better."
"The technical support could improve because I am in India and the support I receive is from the UK or Australia. It is difficult to manage the time difference. The service could be faster. However, when we do have the support they are knowledgeable."
"Crowdstrike Falcon XDR can improve the integration. There are some locks on the cloud to on-premise integrations."
"Falcon could include more integrative features."
"The skillsets needed to run CrowdStrike Falcon are extensive if you want to get the most value out of the tool."
"The current database schema presents challenges and has potential for improvement."
"CrowdStrike Falcon by itself does not supply in-depth reporting."
"We can do a threat analysis of any machine at any time, but that threat analysis is very limited."
"We end up facing a lot of issues after upgrades."
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 107 reviews while Uptycs is ranked 51st in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 1 review. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8, while Uptycs is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Uptycs writes "Great features, good support, and lots of functionality". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, Trend Vision One and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Uptycs is most compared with Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Wiz, Orca Security and Lacework.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors, and best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
