We performed a comparison between Datadog and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect is for us to have everything in one place."
"It is a good one stop location where we keep all our data for our infrastructure, and it's also easier to navigate between different things."
"I find the greatest feature is being able to search across logs from various microservices."
"We can handle debugging and find out why things are breaking in our applications."
"The network map is crucial in identifying bottlenecks and determining what needs more attention."
"Datadog has given us near-live visibility across our entire cloud platform."
"It has enhanced the performance of my team."
"They have a very good foundation in capturing metrics, logs, and traces. It's a very nice tool for that and it allows you to apply these monitoring tools in almost any technology."
"The stability has been very good over the years."
"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."
"They could have better log reporting."
"Datadog could improve the flexibility with AI and ML concepts. This will allow customers to be more leveraged towards publishing."
"I often have issues with the UI in my browser."
"Datadog could always lower the price!"
"Some of the interface is still confusing to use."
"They should continue expanding and integrating with more third-party apps."
"They need to implement template variables into the message response body."
"Even though it is powerful on its own, the UI-based design lacks elegance, efficiency, and complexity."
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."
"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."
Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 58th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Datadog is rated 8.6, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace and AppDynamics. See our Datadog vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.