We performed a comparison between Datadog and Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The visibility that it provides is valuable. It is helping in being proactive around incident management. It is helping us to be able to get more visibility into our customers' applications so that we can assist them at the application layer. We also provide them the infrastructure from an AWS standpoint. We are able to make sure that our customers are aware of certain critical things around the analytical piece of either the network or the application. We're able to call customers before they even know about the issue. From there, we can start putting together some change management processes and help them a bit."
"The performance of Datadog is good."
"By moving to Datadog, we did not need to manage our own monitoring infrastructure anymore."
"The most valuable features are logging, the extensive set of integrations, and easy jumpstart."
"Going from viewing a metric to creating a monitor alerting on a metric is very easy."
"It has a nice UI."
"The network map is crucial in identifying bottlenecks and determining what needs more attention."
"The product has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc."
"Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical VMs, high CPU usage, security concerns."
"Datadog could make their use cases more visible either through their docs or tutorial videos."
"They need to implement template variables into the message response body."
"We need more integration with security tools like Drata."
"It would be nice to be able to graph metrics by excluding certain tags (like you can do in monitors)."
"Ingesting data from various sources to monitor the log metrics of the system can always improve so that, if something goes wrong, the right teams are alerted."
"While I like the ease of use, when compared with Tenable Nessus they could still improve their usability."
"Once agents are connected to the Datadog portal, we should be able to upgrade them quickly."
"Could be a little more user friendly."
"Third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service."
More Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is ranked 40th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review. Datadog is rated 8.6, while Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service writes "Offers real-time alerting and dashboards are great for performance hubs of the database". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI and Nagios Core.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.