We performed a comparison between Docker and Legit Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Software Supply Chain Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Containerization is the most valuable feature. I can communicate to the Docker containers using other containers."
"It is neat and very flexible."
"Feature-wise, Docker is very user-friendly...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the Dockerfile, which makes the life of developers easy. Developers get a real understanding of container creation."
"The lift and shift creates a lightweight image."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is its integration with other solutions, such as KVM and AlmaLinux."
"The most valuable feature is that it is cost-saving."
"The solution is stable."
"Legit has increased my security posture to a level I couldn't achieve before. I don't need to worry as much about what's happening within my developer environments. I can rest assured that my vulnerabilities are being detected."
"The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates."
"Legit has had a positive effect on our overall security posture."
"We implemented Legit Security to gain visibility into all development teams and ensure that consistent controls are in place and accounted for on every route."
"One item that could be improved is the overall stability of Docker."
"We would like to see improvement in adding the node into the Docker Swarm cluster, as at present it is a little tricky and requires a lot of manual steps."
"The volumes for persistent storage could be more user friendly right out of the box."
"Docker can improve the integration with Microsoft Windows. It does not support native installations."
"The command line interface could be more intuitive. I constantly struggle with it."
"We'd like knowledge transfer to be easier."
"Unfortunately, base images are not currently available."
"They should provide proper documentation to understand the solution's cgroup process."
"I would like them to have their own static code scanner, and I'd like them to have their own open-source software scanners."
"Legit Security could do a little better with detecting publicly exposed keys. It's not bad. The detections that they are running get to everything eventually, but it would be great if they could increase some of that awareness."
"The one we're working on right now is the ability to dynamically rerun development teams and groups."
"One issue is that engineering teams don't always embed secrets in the same way, making it difficult for the tool to consistently identify them."
Docker is ranked 5th in Software Supply Chain Security with 40 reviews while Legit Security is ranked 7th in Software Supply Chain Security with 4 reviews. Docker is rated 8.6, while Legit Security is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Legit Security writes "Correlates information based on the integrations I have, which is extremely helpful". Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, whereas Legit Security is most compared with Snyk, Ox Security, Cycode and Cider. See our Docker vs. Legit Security report.
See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.
We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
