We performed a comparison between Eggplant Performance and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Performance Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We find the solution stable and scalable."
"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."
"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."
"The initial setup was straightforward. I was able to download everything myself without any IT support."
"It is also good for reporting purposes, which would be most familiar for QC and UFT users."
"Creating the script is very easy and user friendly."
"Probably its prime advantage, it provides a centralized location for testing."
"It allows you to work out how well you are doing project-wise because you see the number of scripts done, the number of tests run, and whether you have mapped all your requirements to it."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is easy to use and has flexibility that allows it to be used on a variety of applications."
"We haven't had an outage since we started using the solution."
"Support is nice, quick, and responsive."
"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."
"I think better or more integration with some of the monitoring tools that we're considering."
"LoadRunner Enterprise's reporting should be quicker, easier, and more flexible."
"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."
"For such an experienced team as mine, who have been with the product for over ten years, sometimes working with technical support is not that easy."
"I believe the data that demonstrates the automated correlations should be corrected."
"The support team needs to be more coordinated."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"I think better support for cloud-based load generators would help. For example, integrate with Amazon AWS so you can quickly spin up a load generator in the cloud, use it, spin it down."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
Eggplant Performance is ranked 15th in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews while OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 7.8, while OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText Silk Performer, Tricentis NeoLoad and ReadyAPI. See our Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
