We performed a comparison between Eggplant Test and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."
"GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."
"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."
"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."
"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."
"The solution is a stable one."
"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."
"Good text reading ability."
"The mainframe testing and UI automation are the most valuable aspects of the solution."
"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."
"I face no challenges or stability issues."
"The most important feature is its ability to support the technical automation of specific clients that we cannot use with other tools."
"The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are the ease of use, you do not need to program if you do not want to."
"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."
"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."
"The product enables codeless automation."
"The solution would crash from time to time."
"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."
"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."
"It has low productivity."
"We found that we had issues regarding the VPN setup, which is one of the reasons that we did not purchase this solution."
"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."
"Its performance and stability could be better."
"The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement."
"A disadvantage of Tricentis Tosca is that you have to customize it according to your need, during the early stages of the software, particularly during upstream testing, before system and unit testing."
"ScratchBook execution needs to be improved as Tosca crashes multiple times."
"While the initial setup was straightforward, we required assistance with the configuration to ensure that everything was done correctly."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"The product needs to improve its pricing. It also needs to improve the infrastructure and DEX agent setup."
"The source controls that are in Tricentis Tosca have some problems. For example, if you use Selenium or use Java-based application, it's easy to match code from two developers. However, if you're a developer and going to look at Tricentis Tosca, it's very difficult to use the source control measure."
"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."
Eggplant Test is ranked 12th in Test Automation Tools with 16 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 98 reviews. Eggplant Test is rated 7.8, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Eggplant Test writes "Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". Eggplant Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio, froglogic Squish, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify and Postman. See our Eggplant Test vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.