We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and Graylog based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Elastic Security is commended for its adaptability, extensive customization options, and seamless integration with the ELK Stack. Graylog stands out with its exceptional search functions, seamless integration with Elasticsearch, and real-time data access. Elastic Security could improve by reducing resource usage, automating threat response, and simplifying the user experience. Graylog could benefit from additional customization options and an improved rule-creation process.
Service and Support: Some Elastic Security users found their support helpful, while others experienced difficulties and delays. Graylog's customer service is generally well-regarded, with reviewers noting effective solutions and satisfactory experiences. While response times may differ, Graylog's support is considered superior compared to that of other products.
Ease of Deployment: Elastic Security generally has a straightforward setup but may require trained specialists. Some Graylog users said the setup was easy. Other reviewers faced challenges, but these were easily resolved with help from the vendor’s support staff. Graylog is easier to set up in smaller environments, but it could get complicated in large clusters.
Pricing: Elastic Security is considered affordable and cost-effective, with pricing based on the size of the monitored environment. Graylog offers an enterprise edition and an open-source option with a daily capacity restriction. Some users said that data costs can be expensive.
ROI: Elastic Security has shown mixed results in terms of ROI, with some users expressing concerns about the quality of their premium support. Graylog can offer some cost savings. The precise ROI may vary depending on the organization’s size and use case.
"Elastic Security is very easy to adapt."
"The feature that we have found the most valuable is scalability."
"The most valuable features of Elastic Security are it is open-source and provides a high level of security."
"The most valuable feature is the speed, as it responds in a very short time."
"We like Elastic Security because it's a REST API-based solution. That's the primary reason we use it."
"The scalability is good. It can be scaled easily in the production environment."
"I can look at events from more than one source across multiple different locations and find patterns or anomalies. The machine learning capabilities are helpful, and I can create rules for notifications to be more proactive rather than responding after something has gone wrong."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability. We are in Indonesia, more engineers understand Elastic Security here. So it is easier to scale and also develop. In features, the discovery to query all the logs is very important to us. It is very easy, especially with the query function and the feature to generate alerts and create tools. Sometimes we use the alert security dashboard to monitor our clients."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its new interface."
"Graylog's search functionality, alerting functionality, user management, and dashboards are useful."
"What I like about Graylog is that it's real-time and you have access to the raw data. So, you ingest it, and you have access to every message and every data item you ingest. You can then build analytics on top of that. You can look at the raw data, and you can do some volumetric estimations, such as how big traffic you have, how many messages of data of a type you have, etc."
"One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview."
"The product is scalable. The solution is stable."
"This had increased productivity for the dev and support teams, because we are directly notifying them."
"Allowing us to set up alerts and integrate with platforms we already use, such as Slack and OpsGenie to alert users of these errors proactively, is also a very useful feature."
"Everything stands out as valuable, including the fact that I can quantify and qualify the logs, create pipelines and process the logs in any way I like, and create charts or data maps."
"We set up a cron job to delete old logs so that we wouldn't hit a disk space issue. Such a feature should be available in the UI, where old logs can be deleted automatically. (Don’t know if this feature is already there)."
"The biggest challenge has been related to the implementation."
"The problem with ELK is it's difficult to administer. When you have a problem, it can be very, very difficult to rebuild indexes."
"Technical support could respond faster."
"In terms of what could be improved with Elastic, in some use cases, especially on the advanced level, they are not ready made, so you'll have to write some scripts."
"The tool needs to integrate with legacy servers. Big companies can have legacy servers that may not always be updated."
"Their visuals and graphs need to be better."
"I would like the process of retrieving archived data and viewing it in Kibana to be simplified."
"Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest."
"The infrastructure cost is the main issue. I like the rest. If the infrastructure costs could be lower, it would be fantastic."
"Elasticsearch recommendations for tuning could be better. Graylog doesn't have direct support for running the system inside of Kubernetes, so it can be challenging to fill in the gaps and set up containers in a way that is both performant and stable."
"Dashboards, stream alerts and parsing could be improved."
"It would be great if Graylog could provide a better Python package in order to make it easier to use for the Python community."
"Lacks sufficient documentation."
"There should be some user groups and an auto sign-in feature."
"More complex visualizations and the ability to execute custom Elasticsearch queries would be great."
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 59 reviews while Graylog is ranked 11th in Log Management with 18 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Graylog is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Graylog writes "Great detailed search features and easy Java integration, but needs improvement in integration with Python". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and VMware Aria Operations for Logs, whereas Graylog is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and LogRhythm SIEM. See our Elastic Security vs. Graylog report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
