We performed a comparison between ESET Endpoint Encryption and Symantec Endpoint Encryption based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ESET Endpoint Encryption works as an antivirus system."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The tool does not slow down the computer."
"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."
"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is the high level of encryption protection."
"The setup is getting easier."
"The product is easy to implement and configure."
"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is its rate of capturing viruses and malware."
"Its management is good, and it is also scalable and mostly stable."
"It helps us put antivirus solutions in place and prevent malware from getting to our machines."
"It is fairly stable."
"It is stable."
"Their cloud features such as Cloud Endpoint security, ransomware modules, malware, and other modules are very effective."
"The solution is easy to use."
"I like the management aspect of this solution. You don't want to have end-users tweak or set it themselves, so the fact that you could do it from a central point helped us a lot."
"We can extend it to all of the critical endpoints and the servers, and we can ensure the confidentiality of the data."
"Integration with central management needs improvement."
"The overall compatibility of the device is an area where the solution lacks."
"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."
"There could be an option for users to restart the system without a password."
"There should be more frequent updates."
"If you have issues with your network, you can't get updates, which is a problem."
"ESET Endpoint Encryption needs to improve pricing and security."
"I would like to see better compatibility with mobile devices."
"The product can be expensive. Price was a factor in moving away from the product."
"I think that they should improve the on-premises version to include the manageability and simplicity that is available on the cloud."
"The GUI could use some enhancement, particularly in making option sets easier to locate on client machines."
"The program's disk encryption is not very friendly with Microsoft OS updates. We have a problem with updates failing unless we use a time-consuming work-around."
"It's difficult to integrate the solution with the DLP"
"They have too high of a price tag. That's why they're losing the market share."
"It's a bit difficult to get good support. Their response times are really bad."
"I would like them to have integration with a wider range of non-Symantec products."
ESET Endpoint Encryption is ranked 6th in Endpoint Encryption with 13 reviews while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is ranked 7th in Endpoint Encryption with 34 reviews. ESET Endpoint Encryption is rated 8.4, while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Encryption writes "A reasonably priced solution that is an easy-to-use and effective at the same time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Encryption writes "Provides a centralized management console and a straightforward initial setup process ". ESET Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Sophos SafeGuard and WinMagic SecureDoc, whereas Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Digital Guardian and ZENworks Suite. See our ESET Endpoint Encryption vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
