We performed a comparison between F-Secure Total and Vade for M365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Proofpoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Office 365 Protection."There are several features that I consider valuable."
"I would say that 90% of the spam and phishing attack emails get blocked right off the bat."
"The product's scalability is good."
"Defender is a SaaS platform, so it offers more flexibility. Managing the permissions is easier. The solution's automated detection and response features are scalable."
"Threat Explorer is one of the features that I very much like because it is a real-time report that allows you to identify, analyze, and trace security attacks."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 is a stable solution."
"The initial setup was easy."
"The basic features are okay and I'm satisfied with the Defender."
"It's a good product for us. The reports and notifications are very good for us."
"It is a stable solution...My company has no worries about the deployment phase of Vade for Office 365."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 should improve the troubleshooting tools. It's unclear whether the device is blocked at the firewall level or at the device itself. The granularity needed for troubleshooting is currently lacking. From my perspective, Microsoft should address this issue to benefit many users who likely share the same sentiment."
"Microsoft security solutions work as expected. They are constantly updating the solutions to make them better. At the same time, the changes can impact a customer's environment, and we need to adjust settings. Sometimes we aren't aware of the changes, and nothing is pushed from the backend automatically."
"The UI needs to be more user-friendly."
"I'd like some additional features any product can give me to protect our environment in a better way."
"The product must provide better malware detection."
"About eight months ago, we started to measure the quantity of phishing and spam that we have been receiving, and it has been increasing a lot. That means that protection for our email is not as good as we were expecting."
"It would be better if it were more scalable. It depends on the architecture, but we would like to make it more scalable for both data centers."
"This product's effectiveness could be improved, in terms of detecting unwanted spam or even malware between the emails, compared to other products."
"I would like to see in the future is EDR protection and a lower price for F-Secure Total."
"Concerning a bank, data can be confidential, and when a bank needs to transfer such data, it has to be specific to a certain level of conformity, which I did not see in the product."
More Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
F-Secure Total is ranked 7th in Office 365 Protection with 1 review while Vade for M365 is ranked 8th in Office 365 Protection with 1 review. F-Secure Total is rated 9.0, while Vade for M365 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of F-Secure Total writes "Easy to setup and stable solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Vade for M365 writes "A stable tool capable of detecting malware while focusing on anti-phishing to protect its users". F-Secure Total is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, ZoneAlarm, WithSecure Elements Collaboration Protection and ESET PROTECT Enterprise, whereas Vade for M365 is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, Avanan, Hornetsecurity Hornet.email, Mailinblack and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP).
See our list of best Office 365 Protection vendors and best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Office 365 Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
