We performed a comparison between Falcon LogScale and Logpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"It is an AI technology because it is using machine learning technology. So far, there is nothing better out there for UEBA in terms of monitoring endpoints and user activity. It is using machine learning language, so it is right at the top. It provides that capability and monitors all the activities. It devises a baseline and monitors if there is any deviation from the baseline."
"What I like best about LogPoint is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions. LogPoint also has better dashboards which I find valuable. I also like that you can create use cases based on your assets."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"The search feature is valuable. The dashboards are also valuable for our bosses. Another valuable feature, which is the main feature of the product, is the centralization of all the logs."
"They basically charge you in a better way."
"The solution's user interface is quite simple, and the integration is better than other products."
"The integration is very user-friendly. There are not many CLI commands. Everything is directly accessible from the web interface."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the combination of the software and the support that they have."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
"Dashboards could be developed further."
"It is a good product, but its interface or GUI could be better."
"Log management could be better because transporting the log from a password to the client system takes time."
"We were missing visuals and graphics. Recently, a new version seems to have come out, and it has a new graphical user interface. When I was integrating it, it was usable, but the GUI needed improvement."
"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."
"In terms of functionality, it is very good. The only issue is the documentation. Its documentation should be improved."
"Nowadays the trend is going towards the ransomware and the endpoint detection and response. So if they added something for that, that will be very, very good."
"I know that they have user behavior analytics, but it's an extra cost for this feature. It would be nice if it was in with the standard products."
Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review while Logpoint is ranked 29th in Log Management with 20 reviews. Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0, while Logpoint is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logpoint writes "Good technical support but it is complex to use and resource-heavy". Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Splunk Enterprise Security, Grafana Loki and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Logpoint is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Microsoft Sentinel and USM Anywhere.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.