We performed a comparison between Flowmon and Meraki Dashboard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."
"The solution is stable."
"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."
"I would say the ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to set up and get up and running."
"The most valuable feature is the single pane of glass that gives you multisite visibility."
"Meraki Dashboard centralizes control of all our equipment into one cloud-based console, so we can manage it from anywhere. We can resolve problems remotely outside of business hours because it is on the cloud. You can use the dashboard to change security settings or configure routers and switches."
"I like that Meraki Dashboard is a user-friendly product."
"It's a scalable solution."
"We have found the client dashboard to be very simple to use, especially in our Meraki environment."
"An excellent dashboard that is currently unique in covering both SD-WAN and SD-LAN with built-in security."
"Some of the features I have found valuable are the ease of access, simple configuration, and monitoring."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."
"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."
"The licensing price could be better."
"One area that could use improvement in the Meraki Dashboard is user-friendliness when navigating to port configurations."
"The tool needs to incorporate more integration platforms. Integrating technical support features directly into the dashboard would be highly beneficial. This would allow technicians to troubleshoot issues more efficiently."
"Something that needs to be improved, is the fact that you if you don't renew the subscription license, it stops working. I would also like to see SSL BPM support for anything else."
"When users are trying to roam from one location to another location, geographical tracking would be helpful."
"Meraki Dashboard could improve the user interface by making it more user-friendly. The configuring can at times be difficult."
"What we would like from the IT perspective is a lot more granular control, more visibility into the packets, into the routing, and things of that nature."
"Some features could be added."
"The one issue that we have had is that the VPN tunnel would go down unless you worked out with the ISP that you would be using a static IP address on the WAN interface."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Flowmon is ranked 70th in Network Monitoring Software while Meraki Dashboard is ranked 9th in Network Monitoring Software with 51 reviews. Flowmon is rated 8.0, while Meraki Dashboard is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Flowmon writes "A stable and scalable solution allowing for the visibility of and the blocking of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Meraki Dashboard writes "Incredibly easy to use, great troubleshooting and prevention of malicious events". Flowmon is most compared with Darktrace, SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, WhatsUp Gold and ExtraHop Reveal(x), whereas Meraki Dashboard is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds NPM, ThousandEyes, Mist AI and Cloud and Zabbix. See our Flowmon vs. Meraki Dashboard report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.