We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has helped us meet CTI requirements. Some employees accidentally shared information and it was able to block that information. That is one of the biggest benefits we have seen from this tool."
"The Optical Character Recognition (OCR) functionality is another helpful feature, especially for unstructured data. Being able to discover sensitive data in an unstructured format is the most beneficial element of the solution."
"Forcepoint has been the leader in the space for many years and they, are very well established, and mature."
"The GUI is very intuitive. That is the way I would explain its ease of use. It is straightforward."
"Scalability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten."
"The integration is great."
"Our organization's intellectual property is not misused or extracted without permission."
"I like the SaaS solution they're offering now a little bit more. It's a new product but it's easy to install and configure."
"The interface and dashboard are okay."
"The most values feature of this solution are the micro DLP features."
"We find the malware scanning and intrusion detection most valuable for our server management requirements. We can find out who is on our servers and what they have done."
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"We are able to check the log and keep records."
"We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"It is a scalable product."
"Everything can be improved and maybe there is a way to improve the user experience through the interface."
"There's zero Forcepoint presence in West Africa. Customers typically like having these things close to them. It would help if they had a presence here. Right now, Forcepoint West Africa has been administered from South Africa. Because of this, customers can't access premium support in our region."
"The protection of personal data needs to be improved."
"Their discovery or the way they discover the data at risk can also be improved. There are many database servers that are not supported by Forcepoint."
"The policy update size and agent size could be improved. We would also like to have a proper solution for Linux OS which Forcepoint does not offer."
"The deployment and troubleshooting aspects of Forcepoint need improving."
"The setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The APIs for device integration are limited, so that could be improved."
"It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment."
"They could improve the product's data loss policies."
"The platform's support structure for government-specific domain requirements could be improved."
"I would like to provide improved network direction in order to regulate all of the user agents. We only use Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention to manage various threats and malicious user agents currently."
"Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is buggy, which is one area for improvement. I also found Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention support horrible, so that's another area for improvement."
"The tool should improve its reporting functionality. We need a proper reporting feature in a DLP solution."
"Having more features apart from what the product was designed for is what I'd like to see in its next release."
"Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Safetica ONE, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP, Digital Guardian and McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.