We performed a comparison between Fortify WebInspect and NowSecure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HCLTech, OpenText, Rapid7 and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)."I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It is scalable and very easy to use."
"The solution's technical support was very helpful."
"Technical support has been good."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to make our customers more secure."
"Fortify WebInspect is a scalable solution, it is good for a lot of applications."
"The accuracy of its scans is great."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to download an application without actually putting in the APK. It gives us an option to put the APK in if we want to but we can download it from the App Store and Play Store."
"A localized version, for example, in Korean would be a big improvement to this solution."
"We have often encountered scanning errors."
"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."
"The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective."
"Fortify WebInspect's shortcoming stems from the fact that it is a very expensive product in Korea, which makes it difficult for its potential customers to introduce the product in their IT environment."
"Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved."
"Fortify WebInspect could improve user-friendliness. Additionally, it is very bulky to use."
"One thing I would like to see them introduce is a cloud-based platform."
"In this solution, there are two kinds of testing, static analysis, and dynamic analysis. There needs some improvement in testing with dynamic analysis because I have found it is not accurate"
Earn 20 points
Fortify WebInspect is ranked 2nd in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) with 17 reviews while NowSecure doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Fortify WebInspect is rated 7.0, while NowSecure is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Fortify WebInspect writes "A powerful tool catering to multiple use cases that provides reasonably good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NowSecure writes "Scalable and reliable, but dynamic analysis needs improvement". Fortify WebInspect is most compared with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Fortify on Demand, Acunetix, OWASP Zap and HCL AppScan, whereas NowSecure is most compared with Veracode, Data Theorem API Secure , Acunetix, Checkmarx One and GitLab.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.