We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and Fortinet FortiNAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The most valuable features are malware detection, integrates well with other solutions, and ease of use for all users."
"This solution makes it easier to work from home."
"The setup for FortiClient is really straightforward."
"Fortinet FortiClient's scalability is very good because it has no limitations."
"It's easy to use, easy to deploy, and I have more visibility over my network that shows which users are connected to the firewalls, which users are connected to the network, and what they're accessing."
"We like its centralized administration, integration with Active Directory, deployment, and stability of the connection."
"It’s really easy to use."
"There is a lot of documentation available online."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is its integration with all other Fortinet solutions."
"The features are more expandable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is having visibility over the IoT devices on the network."
"I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices."
"When it works, it's great. It keeps things off the network which are supposed to be off the network."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is compliance, which we can do with the clients and the endpoints on the network."
"Fortinet FortiNAC is both scalable and stable."
"It's a very good solution and one thing I have noted is its simplicity and the ease of the set-up process."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"The documentation could be improved."
"I have yet to find the benefits of the latest upgraded version."
"The solution could improve by providing analytics or detailed reports."
"We would like Fortinet to add the function or the possibility to use all FortiClient features for free."
"There isn't much to improve in terms of features and comparison with other vendors. It just needs to stay more up to date in catching the malware. The user interface may be improved, which would be a minor enhancement. Unlike central management, in endpoint security, the end users don't need to keep looking at the endpoint user interface. The technology is the most important thing in endpoint security."
"The solution can improve by adding new remote console or endpoint features to make the solution easier to use."
"We'd like to see a deployment wizard to help implementation become streamlined."
"FortiClient is not communicating with the new version of the firewall."
"Its technical support needs improvement."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's documentation should be improved because there's not much debugging or troubleshooting documentation for the Fortinet FortiNAC."
"For our organization and our clients, the price is the main concern. They should work to make it more competitive."
"Keeping the hard disk on the one series will be easier for the distributor and will keep the prices lower for the customer."
"The platform must enable troubleshooting."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"FortiNAC could be more scalable."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's device compatibility could be improved, particularly for VoIP devices."
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 15th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 86 reviews while Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 44 reviews. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Check Point Remote Access VPN, whereas Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Portnox CORE. See our Fortinet FortiClient vs. Fortinet FortiNAC report.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.