We performed a comparison between Git and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."We use the tool to store codes."
"Git is easy to use."
"The product is easy to use."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."
"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"All of the features in Git are useful."
"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."
"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."
"The main problem for me is the frequent upgrades in the solution because every other upgrade is a minefield. When you do the upgrade, there is always something that doesn't work."
"Git's user interface could be improved."
"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."
"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."
"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."
"The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."
"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 37 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control with 3 reviews. Git is rated 8.6, while Liquibase is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "Easy to use, but we were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue". Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase, Surround SCM and Bitbucket, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket and DBmaestro Database Source Control.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.