Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitHub Logo
2,224 views|926 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
GitLab Logo
4,611 views|3,608 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 9, 2023

We performed a comparison between GitHub and GitLab based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: GitHub’s deployment can be challenging for private repositories and secure shell codes. GitLab’s deployment is straightforward with an emphasis on education.
  • Features: GitLab is a powerful toolset with a comprehensive CI/CD engine, making it the number one tool from that perspective. It's a unified platform that can handle source code management, build, deployment, and artifact management, and has an established roadmap for future enhancements. GitHub's valuable features include version control, parallel development, and forking, and it enables disparate repositories and projects in a single solution that provides good time reduction and security.
  • Pricing: GitHub's pricing is based on user count and license management can be difficult. GitLab has one free and two paid editions with clear pricing.
  • Service and support: GitHub has great tech support. GitLab's customer service may vary for long-time customers.
  • ROI: GitHub has a positive return on investment since it enables improved product release control and time savings. GitLab's ROI is predicted as a result of recent adoption.

Comparison Result: Based on the reviews provided by users, GitHub and GitLab both seem to provide comprehensive and practical software development and project management tools. Long-time users find GitLab's customer service and responsiveness less reliable than GitHub's because they haven't had enough time to develop in that direction.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. GitLab Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is help offered by the community for open-source projects.""If you want to share documents, you can create articles and diagrams with GitHub and share.""I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.""GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files.""There are no issues. It's simple, easy, and fully compatible from my perspective with Git.""The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment.""We can make a private repository.""The learning curve is small."

More GitHub Pros →

"It scales well.""I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software.""The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good.""The most valuable feature of GitLab is the ability to upload scripts and make changes when needed and then reupload them. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly.""Their CI/CD engine is very mature. It's very comprehensive and flexible, and compared to other projects, I believe that GitLab is number one right now from that perspective.""The solution is stable.""I like GitLab's security and SAS tools.""A user friendly solution."

More GitLab Pros →

Cons
"The user interface on GitLab is better.""I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented.""The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved.""The only thing I see missing in GitHub is that it isn't very user friendly for key personnel who don't have in-depth, technical knowledge. In Jira, there are many functions to upload our test cases, and in GitHub we can only do it manually. There are functions which can be used to upload different files, but that still requires some technical knowledge. A layman cannot do it.""There is room for improvement in terms of interface.""The merging features can be improved.""It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it.""The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

More GitHub Cons →

"Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors.""GitLab's UI could be improved.""The integration and storage capabilities could be better.""There is room for improvement in GitLab Agents.""The only thing our company is really waiting on in terms of features is the development of metrics.""We'd always like to see better pricing on the product.""I would like to have some features to support peer review.""Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."

More GitLab Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The private repositories are free, which is very good."
  • "It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable."
  • "If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."
  • "We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."
  • "I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."
  • "The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."
  • More GitHub Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
    Top Answer:We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution. If you buy extra support, you pay an additional cost.
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is high and should be reduced. Our company has a bundle product. Sometimes, people from outside our organization also need to collaborate with our code, and we need to integrate… more »
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significant… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,224
    Comparisons
    926
    Reviews
    48
    Average Words per Review
    349
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    4,611
    Comparisons
    3,608
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    406
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Snyk logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    AWS CodeCommit logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Bitbucket logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Fortify on Demand logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 49% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Overview
    GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Sample Customers
    Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitHub vs. GitLab
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitHub is ranked 12th in Application Security Tools with 74 reviews while GitLab is ranked 7th in Application Security Tools with 70 reviews. GitHub is rated 8.6, while GitLab is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Fortify on Demand and Qualys Web Application Scanning, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, SonarQube, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton. See our GitHub vs. GitLab report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.