HackerOne vs NCC Group Penetration Testing Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HackerOne Logo
1,319 views|1,151 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HackerOne and NCC Group Penetration Testing Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne, Pentera, Veracode and others in Penetration Testing Services.
To learn more, read our detailed Penetration Testing Services Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."
  • More HackerOne Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Penetration Testing Services solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,319
    Comparisons
    1,151
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    330
    Comparisons
    165
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management
    Learn More
    Overview
    HackerOne becomes your partner who executes all aspects of your bug bounty program, including triage, bounty pricing, and hacker relations, allowing you to fully focus on fixing vulnerabilities.

    Our tests are performed by experienced penetration testing specialists who have a wealth of knowledge in diverse IT disciplines including policy, design, implementation and development. We have a reputation for professional expertise and conduct that is unparalleled anywhere in the world. With one of the largest penetration testing teams in the world, our team of experts provide sound advice and practical assistance to multinational organizations around the globe.

    Sample Customers
    Zenefits, Adobe, Yelp
    System Bookings, Blue Rooms Photography
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Real Estate/Law Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Penetration Testing Services
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne, Pentera, Veracode and others in Penetration Testing Services. Updated: June 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HackerOne is ranked 2nd in Penetration Testing Services with 2 reviews while NCC Group Penetration Testing Services is ranked 11th in Penetration Testing Services. HackerOne is rated 9.6, while NCC Group Penetration Testing Services is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HackerOne writes "I was pleasantly surprised by the variety of security issues which were reported, some of which I had never considered or even knew existed". On the other hand, HackerOne is most compared with Bugcrowd, Intigriti, Synack, YesWeHack and Crowdcurity, whereas NCC Group Penetration Testing Services is most compared with Secureworks Adversarial Security Testing.

    See our list of best Penetration Testing Services vendors.

    We monitor all Penetration Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.