We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"More tools are available in OpenShift Container Platform to maintain and manage the clusters."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"Everything is packaged into OpenShift Container Platform."
"On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down."
"The most valuable are security features, particularly when operating in the cloud."
"OpenShift provides tools that tell me everything I have on a container, and I can make it on-premise or on a cloud infrastructure."
"The solution's security throughout the stack and the software supply chain is very reliable. When it was on-prem, it was by default secured by our company firewalls and security tools, and now it's in the cloud, which has its security and systems in place. This provides stability to our infrastructure."
"The platform is easy to scale as it supports Windows worker node."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"The UI could be more user-friendly to drive tasks more effectively through the interface."
"OpenShift needs to improve their container storage."
"OpenShift has a pretty steep learning curve. It's not an easy tool to use. It's not only OpenShift but Kubernetes itself. The good thing is that Red Hat provides specific targeted training. There are five or six pieces of training where you can get certifications. The licenses for OpenShift are pretty expensive, so they could be cheaper because the competition isn't sleeping, and Red Hat must take that into account."
"We encounter difficulties while accessing the environment and managing the cluster. This particular area needs improvement."
"My impression is that this solution is pretty expensive so I think the pricing plan could improve."
"It can take 10 to 15 minutes to deploy a microservice. The CI/CD process takes a long time, and if it's because of OCP, that is something that can be changed."
"I want to see more incorporation of native automation features; then, we could write a code, deploy it directly to OpenShift, and allow it to take care of the automated process. Using this method, we could write one application and have elements copy/pasted to other applications in the development process."
"OpenShift Container Platform is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 16th in Container Management while OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 36 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with Kubernetes, Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Docker and Google Kubernetes Engine, whereas OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service and Google Kubernetes Engine.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
