We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The performance is good."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"The most valuable solution is its simplicity. The solution is simple and easy to use."
"The technical features are very good and it's very useful if you need a wireless solution."
"The initial setup of Ruckus Wireless WAN is very easy."
"I made some comparisons with other competitors and I found that Ruckus was number one in regards to stability."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution."
"Radio management is a valuable feature of the solution."
"Wireless six is the most valuable feature of this solution right now. It has supported the most recent laptop model."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point."
"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"It should be a faster device."
"The solution needs to offer more analytics."
"In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."
"I have some friends who have not heard of Ruckus, but are aware of other competitors."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN we have a lot of component shortages in the world. This has impacted deliveries. We have large back orders of the solution."
"There is a significant issue with wireless functionality in Apple devices, particularly during video calls."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN needs to improve its pricing."
"The initial setup is complex."
"It would be nice to some analytical features built into this solution."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
