IBM Db2 on Cloud vs SQL Azure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
361 views|308 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
11,173 views|5,178 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Db2 on Cloud and SQL Azure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Database as a Service Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reliability is the most valuable feature. It is also user-friendly."

More IBM Db2 on Cloud Pros →

"Its cost benefit is most valuable because you are charged per data unit instead of licensing. You can easily migrate your on-premise SQL to the cloud with a managed instance. That's what it is designed to do. It is easy to take your on-premise or older SQL instance and move it to the cloud. It makes it easy to get off your on-premise SQL and start utilizing the cost benefit of the cloud.""The best thing about the solution is that it is tightly integrated with Azure Functions and Azure App Service, making it easy to deploy to the cloud.""It is very fast in replicating the data from one database to another. We do some extractions from multiple databases to a target database that we use for visualization. It has a good speed.""My impression is that this solution is quite stable.""The data availability and speed are impressive, especially compared to legacy systems. The loading speeds are much faster on Azure SQL.""The interface is awesome.""The solution has become easier to use over time and it's also reasonably priced.""What is really helpful about the Azure SQL is that when we have a problem with our sound queries, we can trade information about what indexes we should create on tables. It's really helpful for me and also for developers."

More SQL Azure Pros →

Cons
"I would give their support a ten if they had more tutorials available."

More IBM Db2 on Cloud Cons →

"I feel that the price is high and it could be reduced.""From a security perspective, although their features are decent, they can always be improved upon, updated, and refined to help protect clients better.""Its price could be better. It is expensive. I am not sure if Microsoft Master Data Services is included in this. If not, Master Data Services can be integrated with Azure SQL. I have only used Master Data Services on-premises.""There is so much information that it becomes confusing at times. The information can be more friendly. They could also provide additional training, especially at the beginning.""I'm not really a SQL DBA, so I can't go into the depths of the areas that need to be improved. They can maybe make it a bit easier to educate people on how to develop SQL Server in Azure. They can provide some free seminars and webinars and more training in general for easier migration. I know there is some stuff on Microsoft learning, but it would be helpful and useful to have more up-to-date content.""There are certain shortcomings when it comes to the stability of the product, especially if I consider the fact that there can always be some bug-related issues in the tool.""I was using a user list for connecting a program in OTF for getting information. The connection in SQL Azure can improve by being easier because at the moment I have to use private certificates for user authentication. I had to do additional configuration to have the connections.""They should include more accessible functions for image tooling."

More SQL Azure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We have a three-year contract. The cost was somewhere around $70-80,000 for the original deployment, which was about two years ago"
  • "I'm not sure what the exact price is, but it's a moderate amount. It's not too expensive."
  • "The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
  • "We pay less than $1000 monthly in licensing fees. There are no additional costs."
  • "It is expensive for us. We are looking for something less expensive and thinking of migrating the whole system."
  • "It is reasonable."
  • "It is quite expensive. I would definitely recommend not using the pay-as-you-go model because this will just mean all your money will go to Microsoft. So, really make sure to control resource usage as much as possible."
  • "It's reasonably priced and when you compare it with other products in the cloud environment, it's cheaper."
  • More SQL Azure Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
    Top Answer:I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    361
    Comparisons
    308
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    Views
    11,173
    Comparisons
    5,178
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    A fully-managed cloud SQL database. Powered by a turbo-charged Db2 engine.

    Microsoft Azure SQL Database is a relational database-as-a-service that delivers predictable performance, scalability, business continuity, data protection, and near-zero administration to cloud developers and solution architects. This is the deep technical library for Azure SQL Database.
    Sample Customers
    Owens-Illinois, KONE Corp., Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue, Canon Europe, Delhaize America, Wimbledon
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    University12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization62%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise65%
    Large Enterprise24%
    Buyer's Guide
    Database as a Service
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Db2 on Cloud is ranked 12th in Database as a Service while SQL Azure is ranked 2nd in Database as a Service with 90 reviews. IBM Db2 on Cloud is rated 9.0, while SQL Azure is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Db2 on Cloud writes "Reliable and user-friendly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Azure writes "The SQL connector effectively syncs data to databases". IBM Db2 on Cloud is most compared with Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL, whereas SQL Azure is most compared with Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, MongoDB Atlas, Oracle Database as a Service and vCloud Air.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.