IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Polarion ALM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
738 views|307 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Siemens Logo
1,895 views|1,240 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Engineering Workflow Management and Polarion ALM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Suvajit Chakraborty
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture.""Traceability reporting is inbuilt and includes all your requirements.""Good for managing stories, sprints, hydration and releases.""Agile templates give us a standard methodology for every Agile project. Also, the ability to create our own object types and linkages to features/epics allows us to enhance the verification of feature readiness.""All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security.""The most valuable features of the solution are highly customizable reports and visibility for all the higher management.""We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pros →

"I am impressed with the solution’s stability.""The best feature of Polarion ALM to me is its traceability link.""Polarion ALM's integration is very good and easy to use.""It offers good performance.""It is a very stable solution.""It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins.""The tool helped us to more effectively and efficiently gather and structure the information (requirements, test plans, project management data, etc.), and share it with the involved stakeholders in a safe and change-controlled manner.""The solution offers good integration."

More Polarion ALM Pros →

Cons
"If you have multiple projects on one server, the tool becomes very slow, and some reports take longer to load.""The solution is very heavily vendor dependent.""We have encountered issues with stability. We have seen where the entire system kind of goes for a toss when certain people use certain types of queries, which are very costly. Then the system kind of slows down a bit, and we have to monitor it.""Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans.""Lacks ability to customize and reporting can be slow.""Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Cons →

"Technical support needs some improvement.""The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and a server-based application rather than client based.""Based on my understanding, the tool's integration capabilities with multiple tools is an area of concern that Polarion needs to focus on more.""The solution's editing capabilities need improvement.""The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on.""Test management lacks an automated process.""One of Polarion's shortcomings would be planning. It can handle plans, but the planning feature is very basic.""The planning and task management aspects of the solution were not that easy."

More Polarion ALM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition."
  • "It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."
  • "It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. The cost per token is around $115-$120."
  • "I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools."
  • More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."
  • "If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."
  • "Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "Software for medical devices is always expensive."
  • "You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."
  • "It is an expensive product."
  • More Polarion ALM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
    Top Answer:Customers need to pay for a license to use this product. It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. We have about 7,800 tokens, and including maintenance… more »
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use… more »
    Top Answer:At the moment, I haven't looked in-depth into what needs improvement in the product. Based on my understanding, the tool's integration capabilities with multiple tools is an area of concern that… more »
    Top Answer:I work in an industry where I mainly look after the requirements, for which I use Polarion ALM.
    Ranking
    Views
    738
    Comparisons
    307
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,076
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    1,895
    Comparisons
    1,240
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

    The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

    Sample Customers
    Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
    Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company43%
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company23%
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company36%
    Healthcare Company21%
    Transportation Company14%
    Consumer Goods Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company24%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise80%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 10th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 15 reviews while Polarion ALM is ranked 8th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 17 reviews. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 6.8, while Polarion ALM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion ALM writes "Though needing an improvement in reporting and time for extraction of the data, its integration capabilities are good". IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Jira, Codebeamer, Microsoft Azure DevOps, GitLab and Endevor, whereas Polarion ALM is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Codebeamer, PTC Integrity and Rally Software. See our IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.