We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and SAP Mobile Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."The biggest thing for us is enforcing logins only from devices that are managed by Intune."
"Stable solution at a good price."
"Its security is most valuable. It gives us a way to secure devices, not only those that are steady. We do have a few tablets and other devices, and it is a way for us to secure these devices and manage them. We know they're out there and what's their status. We can manage their life cycle and verify that they're updated properly."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"It is a helpful tool to manage BYOD policies."
"Mobile device management is most valuable."
"I like that we can implement conditional access."
"The tool's most valuable features are application, distribution, and security. It helps to block user access."
"Maas360 uses distribution groups to deploy apps, which makes it a bit easier than, for example, Intune."
"The solution is quite stable."
"It is a stable solution."
"The graphic, friendly interface allowed us to start without almost any support from the manufacturer."
"The most valuable feature is that it's comprehensive - it covers mobile devices and laptops in one package."
"We've found the scalability to be very good."
"The best feature is the ability to control mobile phones, wipe and containerize the data, and keep employees' work data separate from personal data."
"Two of the very fascinating features that make SAP Mobile Platform stand out from other platforms are its offline capability and integration capability."
"Both platforms, the SAP Mobile Platform, and SAP, are highly valuable for our company because they facilitate integration, which can be expensive. It's very convenient to connect and create billing accounts through the SAP Mobile Platform."
"Technical support is helpful."
"One valuable feature of SAP Mobile Platform is its enterprise-grade standard and maintained APIs, available out of the box for easy integration with various systems."
"It's not that difficult to set up."
"The initial setup is not overly complex."
"The reporting is subpar. That's the only issue we have with Intune. We use another solution for that purpose."
"The feature that allows us to import the business application from the configuration manager to Intune is not very good at this time."
"I think there should be a better tracking of the cell phones used on the Intune."
"Integrating certain group policies can be challenging and may necessitate using on-premises systems to integrate them with Microsoft Intune."
"The solution requires Mac support."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"There is no catalog for mobile access management (MAM) security."
"They should improve its compatibility with other operating systems such as iOS and Linux. It supports Linux but they still need to work on the iOS part."
"IBM MaaS360 needs to have stronger points when it comes to the area of BYOD."
"The product needs to improve tech support."
"The solution needs to offer live technical support. Right now, it's just a chat window and it's rather unhelpful."
"Local technical support would be helpful."
"We had a problem with Microsoft computers. If you downloaded emails on a Microsoft Windows Surface PC, that would also require a license. The Outlook application didn't look great for us on a PC."
"Its integration with Microsoft Teams could be better."
"It would be ideal to add support for the distribution of windows.exe applications."
"Sometimes IBM MaaS360 seems buggy...The solution's technical support team is sometimes slow to respond and not competent enough."
"One drawback is that SAP Mobile Platform apps are only available through the browser, making offline capability more challenging to implement."
"SAP has announced that they'll be ending the support on the SAP platform."
"If it was low code or no code it would be ideal."
"The cost of the SAP Mobile Platform is high, and there is room for improvement in its pricing."
"The licensing model is a bit dated."
"The toolkit to develop front end applications, especially native applications, is not that good."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while SAP Mobile Platform is ranked 12th in Mobile Development Platforms with 7 reviews. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while SAP Mobile Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Mobile Platform writes "Flexible, well-designed, and offers good scalability". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, SOTI MobiControl, Jamf Pro, IBM MobileFirst and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), whereas SAP Mobile Platform is most compared with Android SDK, OutSystems, Ionic, Appium and IBM MobileFirst.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.