We performed a comparison between IBM MQ and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software."Assists with our apps and has great message processing."
"There are a lot of extensible options for security, i.e., various things you can do. It's pretty easy to navigate."
"The scalability of IBM MQ is good."
"The most valuable feature of IBM MQ is transaction processing."
"IBM MQ's flexibility has sped up our active communication."
"I have found the solution to be very robust. It has a strong reputation, easy to use, simple to configure in our enterprise software, and supports all the protocols that we use."
"The solution allows one to easily configure an IBM MQQueueManager."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a very strong integration platform but it is quite a monolithic solution. It's got everything."
"Tanzu Greenplum's most valuable features include the integration of modern data science approaches across an MPP platform."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"Large amounts of data can be moved pretty fast using the solution."
"Very fast for query processing."
"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
"Reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"The solution should offer a freeware version, free vouchers, or certifications for learning purposes and building knowledge base."
"It could always be more stable and secure."
"I would like to see it integrate with the newer ways of messaging, such as Kafka. They might say that you have IBM Integration Bus to do that stuff, but it would be great if MQ could, out-of-the-box, listen to public Kafka."
"You should be able to increase the message size. It should be dynamic. Each queue has a limitation of 5,000."
"MQ needs instruments for connection with new modern queues like Kafka or RabbitMQ."
"I would like to see message duplication included."
"It needs a User Interface which is better than the aging MQ Explorer. The existing solution MQ Explorer is outdated."
"It would be great if the dashboard had additional features like a board design."
"Lacks sufficient inbuilt machine-learning functions for complex use cases."
"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."
"If messages pile up until the space of the memory is full, then basically, the cluster goes down, and someone has to log in through the backend and purge all messages."
"Tanzu Greenplum's compression for GPText could be made more efficient."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
"I saw some limitation with respect to the column store, and removing this would be an improvement."
"One of the disadvantages, not a disadvantage with the product itself, but overall, is the expertise in the marketplace. It's not easy to find a Greenplum administrator in the market, compared to other products such as Oracle."
"They need to enhance integration with other Big Data products... to integrate with Big Data platforms, and to open a bi-directional connection between Greenplum and Big Data."
IBM MQ is ranked 2nd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 158 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. IBM MQ is rated 8.4, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". IBM MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ, PubSub+ Event Broker and Amazon SQS, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ, ActiveMQ, Red Hat AMQ and Oracle Exadata.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
