We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Mezmo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The feature that I have found most valuable is how it monitors the real network. That is its leading security feature."
"The most valuable feature is the DSM Editor. The custom parsing tool is very nice, outstanding."
"The best feature of IBM QRadar is visualization which shows you when there's a spike in the system, and this makes you realize that there's something wrong with the log."
"IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson is a stable solution."
"It is very stable. We have not faced interruptions in the past four and a half years."
"The stability is good."
"The solution is flexible and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the machine learning module."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"I would like to see a better GUI."
"Some UI enhancements would be nice, such as exporting custom event properties and the ability to export rules."
"IBM needs to invest more into the collaboration with other vendors."
"There could be improvements made to the UI, the user interface. Though the newer version, 7.3.2, might already have this improvement in place."
"For the common needs of clients to fulfill requirements, a real integration with Blueworks Live (BPA modeling tool also from IBM) and a more suitable BPM on cloud solution for midsize customers."
"With IBM Security QRadar, my company faced issues with the support we received for the product."
"The technical support can be improved a little bit, and the price could be cheaper."
"QRadar needs to be more specialized, along the lines of what other SIEM solutions are."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
Earn 20 points
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while Mezmo is ranked 53rd in Log Management. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Mezmo is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Mezmo is most compared with Cribl Stream and Datadog. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Mezmo report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.