We performed a comparison between IFS Cloud Platform and Oracle Enterprise Asset Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)."The financial posting controls are quite handy. The user interface is really friendly, highly flexible, and pretty intuitive for end users."
"The product is quite flexible."
"The best feature is the maintenance module, which is essentially an industry-specific workflow designed with a manufacturing module as per industry standards. It's very precise and specific without having complex functionalities. It's straightforward. Field Service Management is definitely a wonderful product that IFS has developed because it caters to field services. The energy and utility sectors can answer their business needs using the software."
"IFS Applications is an all-in-one solution for finance, accounting, and production."
"IFS has been completely rebuilt, modernized, and cloud-based so we don't need bulky software installations."
"Individual user profiles that can be configured as templates to minimize data entry."
"One of our favorite features is the "Info-Zone", which provides operational intelligence in flight and in context to guide both business users and support teams to productivity."
"There tends not to be a massive weakness in the product itself, as weaknesses can quickly be resolved in the next patch or the next release."
"The whole product is important and valuable to us."
"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The technical support my company receives from the implementation partners of the solution is not that great."
"We would like to see AI-driven CSI functions built into the tool that would allow us to quickly tie our improvement goals to metrics and activities, so Assyst will suggest the next steps to help us get closer to our goals."
"Aspects of HR and payroll could be better."
"It would be ideal if, in the future, the product could incorporate IoT and blockchain elements. We'd like to explore more of these types of features going forward."
"The CRM was shaky and although this improves in Apps 10, there is room for improvement."
"The user interface can be improved. When you're clicking through the screens, there are some icons or symbols that really need updating and would be more useful and noticeable if they are aesthetically pleasing."
"An area for improvement would be transactions, which can be tedious to complete as the process is very complex."
"Some kind of bot assistance, some kind of artificial intelligence to help people solve the problems, would be interesting."
"The product is not user-friendly."
More Oracle Enterprise Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IFS Cloud Platform is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 29 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is ranked 4th in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 1 review. IFS Cloud Platform is rated 7.8, while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of IFS Cloud Platform writes "Robust, customizable, and modern". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management writes "The product is not user-friendly, and it is very expensive, though it is highly stable". IFS Cloud Platform is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and IBM Maximo, whereas Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is most compared with IBM Maximo, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM and Infor CloudSuite.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
