We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."The dashboard is good and user-friendly."
"Real-time monitoring is also a great tool, as you may watch several parameters in real time."
"This product is a reliable defense from malicious attacks on a network environment."
"We have peace of mind that nobody will use malware on us or try to hack our website."
"Incapsula takes care of the CDN infrastructure and bandwidth volume, providing several enterprise "load balancing" features."
"On the activity log, I can see the exact details, the visit, and the threat."
"Technical support provides good, quick responses."
"An improvement has been to our website: It increases the speed of our response, the capacity of the site, and optimizes the bandwidth."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"The most valuable features are vulnerability detection and the scanning capability to enable identification of vulnerabilities across our network."
"The initial setup was good. We didn't have any problems with it."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"The reporting is fine."
"It's a good product. After the scan our internet works well. It scans our security posture."
"I find the most valuable features are the continuous monitoring. Even on premises, there is constant monitoring."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"Certificate management could be improved."
"The rules surrounding the making of web applications could be improved."
"Some maintenance must be performed by our IT team."
"The weakest point of Imperva is their first level of support, which should be improved. They should also improve the access and security logs viewing directly on the portal. I would like to see better access and security logs through the portal and not only through a SIM solution. Currently, if you want to explore your access and security logs from Imperva, you need a SIM tool or a SIM infrastructure on your side to do it. You can't do it manually or directly through the portal, which is a big problem for us. I had a call yesterday with Imperva for the roadmap, and I just told them this. They agreed that this is an improvement point from their side."
"Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"One of the biggest issues from the clients' perspective is that all Qualys computing is on the cloud."
"There needs to be better documentation."
"It is a struggle to be able to pull our report and to be able to do onboarding using automated tools."
"Sometimes we face a problem with accessing the tool and not getting an expected result. From a technology point of view, they need to look into this."
"The disadvantage of working with Qualys is that the graphical interface is quite outdated."
"Improve the API speed."
"The reporting and the GUI need improvements."
"Qualys could improve the inbuilt dashboards."
Imperva DDoS is ranked 7th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 74 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
